Drew Starkey's 'Onslaught' character playlist 91%

7/24/2026, 12:04:31 PM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Recency Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 54.8% saturation with 119 hits. Analysis detected 640 faulty-reasoning hits from 217 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 84.9% and a BS Rank of 91% (2,022 of 21,838 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 90.70% of the video peer group.

Your character uses music to really like 
tap into 
>> Yes. 
>> you know, into his work. I'm curious, is there a playlist that you 
>> Yes. 
Yeah, Adam sent me an amazing playlist of um 
a lot of like the Can got and um 
DAF tracks that you hear like a lot of German a lot of German stuff. Um 
but yeah, a lot of a lot of the the tunes that you hear in the movie were on 
that were on that playlist and yeah, really got us in the mood. Yeah. 
>> Adam told me to go and listen to some old recordings of Marlene Dietrich talking to think about how she sounded. 
So, I was kind of I started listening to her singing actually cuz it's pretty good actually. 
>> [laughter] 
>> It's a good playlist. 
>> I had a lot of like Aphex Twin and some house music and like Death Grips so I remember I had like a lot of Death Grips on there. I just anything kind of sex club vibey. 
>> [laughter] 
>> That was the title of the playlist I think. 
Yeah. 
>> Yeah, [laughter] yeah. Sex club vibey. I 
sent it to Adam and he was like, "Yeah, 
yeah." 
>> That's it. 
Confirmation Bias
13.8%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
32.7%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
4.6%
Framing Effect
13.4%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
1.4%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
17.5%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
6.5%
Self-Serving Bias
7.8%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
9.7%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
24.9%
Primacy Effect
2.3%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
18.4%
False Dilemma
6.5%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
16.1%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
5.5%
Appeal to Emotion
8.3%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
6.5%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
13.8%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
54.8%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
26.3%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
4.1%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

217 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.