NTD100%

Trump: In 18 months, We Slashed Trade Deficit With China By 71%! 98%

7/27/2026, 7:00:09 PM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 27 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Emotion, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 47.7% saturation with 113 hits. Analysis detected 955 faulty-reasoning hits from 237 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 95.1% and a BS Rank of 98% (630 of 25,189 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 97.50% of the video peer group.

My policy is simple. If you make your truck or your car in a foreign country, 
you have to pay for the privilege of sending it into our market and make it a lot of money. 
But if you build in a factory in Michigan or someplace in our country and make your automobiles or trucks right here in America, you pay 
zero taxes, zero tariff. You pay zero, zero tariff. There are no tariffs. 
And we've taken in hundreds of billions of dollars for the country aside from it, 
but we keep a lot. 
As an example, Europe is being taken over by the Chinese cars. 
We don't have to the best of my knowledge, Mary, one Chinese car in the country. 
They have a 100% tariff and our auto makers are doing, I think, business 
like you've never done before, right? 
In 18 months, we've slashed our trade deficit with China by the largest amount in history. 
We got our trade deficit down by 71%. 
71%. 
Worldwide. One year ago, our country was dead and now we are the hottest country anywhere in the world. 
We're the hottest country. Everybody is 
respecting us. You know, they respect us again. 
They respect the United States. I think they respect us more than they've ever. 
And we did this in a year and a half. 
Confirmation Bias
6.3%
Anchoring Bias
6.8%
Availability Heuristic
13.5%
Representativeness Heuristic
5.1%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
38.8%
Framing Effect
26.2%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
13.1%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
27%
Self-Serving Bias
12.2%
Fundamental Attribution Error
5.9%
Actor-Observer Bias
5.9%
In-Group Bias
14.3%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
5.9%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
7.2%
Primacy Effect
5.5%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
5.9%
False Dilemma
19%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
24.1%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
11%
Appeal to Emotion
28.3%
Begging the Question
0.4%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
21.9%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
11%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
3.4%
Anecdotal
30%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
47.7%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
6.8%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

237 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.