NBC News⁠99%

Trump reflects on Obama's previous WHCD joke about him ⁠93%

7/25/2026, 3:52:05 AM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Availability Heuristic, and Anecdotal, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 41.4% saturation with 94 hits. Analysis detected 727 faulty-reasoning hits from 227 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 87.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠93% (1,657 of 21,886 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 92.40% of the video peer group.

AndĀ there'sĀ oneĀ timeĀ inĀ particularĀ whenĀ 
BarackĀ HusseinĀ ObamaĀ hostedĀ it.Ā DoĀ youĀ knowĀ whoĀ thatĀ is?Ā 
AndĀ heĀ hitĀ meĀ hard,Ā butĀ actuallyĀ heĀ hitĀ meĀ withĀ respect.Ā 
>>Ā DonaldĀ TrumpĀ isĀ hereĀ tonight.Ā 
SayĀ whatĀ youĀ willĀ aboutĀ Mr.Ā Trump,Ā heĀ certainlyĀ wouldĀ bringĀ someĀ changeĀ toĀ theĀ WhiteĀ House.Ā 
Let'sĀ seeĀ whatĀ we'veĀ gotĀ upĀ there.Ā 
>>Ā AndĀ IĀ haveĀ watchedĀ thisĀ clipĀ thousandsĀ ofĀ times.Ā 
TheyĀ keepĀ playingĀ itĀ cuzĀ theyĀ thinkĀ thatĀ wasĀ eveningĀ IĀ decidedĀ toĀ runĀ forĀ president.Ā 
ItĀ wasĀ not.Ā InĀ fact,Ā IĀ lovedĀ theĀ evening.Ā 
IĀ lookedĀ atĀ myĀ wife.Ā 
IĀ said,Ā "CanĀ youĀ believeĀ it?Ā AllĀ theseĀ people,Ā that'sĀ allĀ they'reĀ doingĀ isĀ talkingĀ aboutĀ me.Ā IĀ loveĀ thisĀ dinner."Ā 
It'sĀ true.Ā 
AndĀ ObamaĀ wasĀ nice.Ā 
HeĀ YouĀ know,Ā it'sĀ amazingĀ howĀ thingsĀ workĀ out.Ā 
HeĀ actuallyĀ showedĀ aĀ pictureĀ ofĀ theĀ WhiteĀ HouseĀ withĀ aĀ bigĀ TrumpĀ onĀ top,Ā likeĀ IĀ putĀ aĀ sign.Ā 
AndĀ youĀ know,Ā I'mĀ startingĀ toĀ doĀ that,Ā whenĀ youĀ thinkĀ aboutĀ it.Ā Right?Ā 
IĀ mean,Ā heĀ wasn'tĀ reallyĀ wrong,Ā butĀ no,Ā heĀ wasĀ respectful.Ā 
HeĀ wasĀ goodĀ andĀ andĀ itĀ hadĀ ButĀ itĀ hadĀ nothingĀ toĀ doĀ itĀ hadĀ nothingĀ toĀ do.Ā 
IĀ justĀ decidedĀ thatĀ IĀ wantedĀ toĀ makeĀ AmericaĀ greatĀ again.Ā 
ThisĀ hadĀ nothingĀ toĀ doĀ withĀ thatĀ dinner.Ā 
Confirmation Bias
16.7%
Anchoring Bias
3.1%
Availability Heuristic
26.4%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0.9%
Framing Effect
16.3%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
4.4%
Optimism Bias
19.4%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
17.2%
Self-Serving Bias
41.4%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
4.8%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
9.3%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
2.6%
Primacy Effect
4%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
4.8%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
16.7%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
32.2%
Begging the Question
22.5%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
7%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
10.6%
Appeal to Nature
4%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
25.1%
No True Scotsman
7.9%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
22.9%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

227 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.