BS Summary: This video contains 27 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Burden of Proof, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 21.2% saturation with 109 hits. Analysis detected 1,210 faulty-reasoning hits from 514 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 85.6% and a BS Rank of 92% (1,930 of 21,887 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 91.20% of the video peer group.
Chuck D'Vor is a retired Army intelligence officer.
Do you think this latest round is going to do the trick?
>> Well, Jesse, I guess that's the uh
that's the big question.
Uh I don't think it will in the sense that let's
say they do agree to sign an agreement.
Are they really going to stick to it or uh will they not agree to sign a document and try to string things along some more?
Uh I think what we've seen in the last two two nights is similar to the concept of peeling back layers of an onion.
Uh last night's strikes were about neutralizing air defense systems and radars uh in retaliation of course for that drone hitting the Apache and almost killing our two pilots.
Uh it's just as you said it's a miracle that they survived especially the part about ditching in the ocean at night.
That's actually really dangerous.
Uh so we're peeling back the the layers of defense in Iran and then tonight we hit them even harder and deeper.
And so what that does is it sets up the opportunity if
the president pulls the trigger of really unleashing an enormous amount of damage in a short period of time in Iran.
From listening to Trey, you get the sense that Trump's patience has run out and that he's going to keep a sustained air campaign on these people until they sign what he wants them to sign.
Is that your sense?
>> Uh that certainly seems to be uh my sense of what's going on.
Uh I would like to employ a historical analogy even though sometimes they can be strained too far.
If you think about the war against Imperial Japan in the closing hours of 1945, you know, we took Okinawa at great cost.
We were firebombing Japanese cities.
We had choked them off from their food supply.
And yet, it took two atomic bombs to force surrender.
And even then, the Japanese Imperial Army wasn't convinced that they should surrender.
They wanted to fight on.
And thank goodness they didn't.
There would have been millions and millions of casualties on both sides.
So, you know, it there's historical precedence for
really difficult uh enemies who never want to surrender.
And when you think about it, Jesse, of course, the IRGC doesn't want to surrender.
They think they may lose their lives to the Iranian people who are getting pretty uh ticked off about the misrule that they've suffered since 1979.
Yeah, the IRGC's kind of in a nifty little position during the ceasefire, but hopefully
these latest round of strikes kind of shake things loose and we can get some of the moderate negotiators to sign and
then just enforce it.
Then no money is going to exchange hands unless we see that dust destroyed.
Chuck, thank you.
Be sure to like and subscribe for all the Fox News latest on YouTube and catch full shows streaming now on Fox
Analysis
Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.