NTD⁠100%

Trump: Canada Fires Poisoning Air ⁠95%

7/20/2026, 3:00:01 PM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Burden of Proof, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 32.6% saturation with 42 hits. Analysis detected 372 faulty-reasoning hits from 129 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 92.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠95% (962 of 18,897 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 94.90% of the video peer group.

AndĀ thenĀ howĀ didĀ thatĀ go?Ā 
>>Ā Well,Ā itĀ wentĀ good,Ā butĀ IĀ IĀ toldĀ them,Ā IĀ 
mean,Ā youĀ gotĀ toĀ stopĀ theseĀ firesĀ fromĀ 
comingĀ inĀ and,Ā youĀ know,Ā poisoningĀ ourĀ air.Ā OurĀ airĀ hasĀ beenĀ poisoned.Ā 
IĀ haveĀ aĀ goodĀ relationshipĀ withĀ MarkĀ 
Carney,Ā butĀ 
youĀ know,Ā weĀ gotĀ toĀ stopĀ theĀ firesĀ upĀ 
there.Ā IfĀ weĀ canĀ helpĀ them,Ā we'llĀ helpĀ 
them.Ā 
ButĀ maybeĀ theyĀ shouldĀ payĀ usĀ someĀ damagesĀ orĀ something,Ā orĀ weĀ shouldĀ doĀ 
someĀ tariffs.Ā 
ButĀ itĀ wasĀ terrible.Ā IĀ mean,Ā youĀ hadĀ businessesĀ closing.Ā 
InĀ particular,Ā Michigan,Ā 
ifĀ youĀ lookĀ atĀ theĀ Detroit,Ā theĀ Detroit,Ā 
MichiganĀ area,Ā theyĀ closedĀ everything.Ā 
TheyĀ didn'tĀ closeĀ carĀ plantsĀ andĀ aĀ lotĀ ofĀ otherĀ things.Ā So,Ā 
I'veĀ neverĀ rememberedĀ thisĀ happening.Ā 
Confirmation Bias
9.3%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
16.3%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
3.9%
Framing Effect
17.1%
Loss Aversion
10.9%
Status Quo Bias
1.6%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
14.7%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
31%
Self-Serving Bias
5.4%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
5.4%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
3.9%
Primacy Effect
6.2%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
5.4%
False Dilemma
10.9%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
11.6%
Red Herring
1.6%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
32.6%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
10.1%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
24%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
3.9%
Anecdotal
26.4%
No True Scotsman
9.3%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
23.3%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
3.9%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

129 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.