Fox News97%

DHS Secretary Mullin: We are simply enforcing the laws Congress passed 96%

5/9/2026, 10:30:07 PM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and In-Group Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 38.4% saturation with 179 hits. Analysis detected 1,542 faulty-reasoning hits from 466 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 93.1% and a BS Rank of 96% (812 of 16,813 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 95.20% of the video peer group.

Homeland Security Secretary Mark Wayne 
Mullen spoke moments ago in Kansas City, Missouri on the need to fully fund ICE and border protection for the next three years. 
Listen, in 38 days, it put our mission at in jeopardy. 
Now, can we still deliver? Yes. 
Were we able to be as proactive? No. 
Absolutely not. 
We had local law enforcement, not just federal, but we had local law enforcement that had moous signed with us that we couldn't reimburse. 
We haven't been able to reimburse since February. 
We're writing the checks now. 
And they knew that we have 11 host cities hosting 78 games in 38 days. 
And as I said, six right here in Kansas City. 
It's the largest sporting event in the world. 
And leading up to it, for 76 days, the Democrats want to shut us down. 
And one congressman right here in our own backyard, Democrat, Congressman Emanuel Clever, I'm going to read you his quote. 
He said, "I voted against funding for the Democrat or for the Department of Homeland Security because I refuse to endorse an agency that's lost their moral compass." 
How do we lose our moral compass? We're simply enforcing the laws that Congress passed. 
We didn't make the laws. We didn't even make the statutes. 
Congress did. 
And if they wanted to change it, they could have. 
They had two years underneath the Biden administration with Nancy Pelosi as speaker that they could have changed it. 
They wanted to. 
Chuck Schumer was the leader of the Senate. They could have changed it if they wanted to. No, they didn't. 
Why? Because if you really get down to it, it's not about enforcing the law. 
It's about going against their policy. 
What's the Democrat's policy? They want open borders 
and they spend more time protecting the criminals than they do fighting for justice for their own constituents. 
open borders, which is obvious when they want to defund custom border protection, and they want to prevent ICE 
from going out and rounding up the criminals and the worst of the worst. 
And they're willing to shut down all 20 other components throughout the Department of Homeland to do that. 
That has to change. 
The American people has to change. 
The American people decided they wanted a change when they put President Trump in office. 
That's evident. 
But they haven't. 
They've lost their moral compass. 
Million Cleaver needs to understand you've lost your moral compass. 
When you're willing to put the lives of your constituent at risk so you can have political talking points and get reelected. 
Be sure to like and subscribe for all 
the Fox News latest on YouTube and catch full shows streaming now on Fox 
Confirmation Bias
14.4%
Anchoring Bias
11.2%
Availability Heuristic
9.9%
Representativeness Heuristic
3.2%
Hindsight Bias
5.4%
Overconfidence Bias
0.9%
Framing Effect
22.3%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0.9%
Sunk Cost Effect
0.9%
Optimism Bias
2.4%
Pessimism Bias
7.3%
Negativity Bias
38.4%
Self-Serving Bias
8.8%
Fundamental Attribution Error
16.5%
Actor-Observer Bias
4.3%
In-Group Bias
16.7%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
9%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
1.7%
Primacy Effect
6.4%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
10.1%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
12%
False Dilemma
15.2%
Slippery Slope
3.9%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
13.5%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
6.9%
Appeal to Emotion
32.6%
Begging the Question
13.7%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
6.7%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
7.7%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
1.3%
Anecdotal
8.4%
No True Scotsman
4.1%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
3.2%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
6.4%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
4.7%

466 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.