Colman Domingo on the success of 'Michael': 'Audiences are eating it up' 92%

5/20/2026, 11:43:08 PM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 14 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Self-Serving Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 74.1% saturation with 160 hits. Analysis detected 1,035 faulty-reasoning hits from 216 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 86.6% and a BS Rank of 92% (1,488 of 16,813 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 91.20% of the video peer group.

What's it like to be in the number one movie in the world? 
It feels exceptional. 
I think we uh I think we told a good a good story and I think the audiences are eating it up and going to see it four and five times. 
It is exceptional. 
I knew the impact that Michael had around the world and I thought if we delivered a good film and something that the audiences feel honors Michael's legacy as a creative, then we're doing our doing a good job and I feel like it's delivered and it feels great. 
I think I've gotten the best compliments from um Katherine Jackson, knowing that she believes that we delivered a beautiful film that honors Michael's legacy. 
I think a lot of the family they've been very happy and given me so much love about the way I portrayed Joe and giving him this full sense of humanity and not sort of like the the broad strokes of sort of like a a tough villainous sort of character that people embedded in their minds, but I want to look at the human, the father and and I think that it's been received as such, which is great. 
Confirmation Bias
48.6%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
14.4%
Representativeness Heuristic
37%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
17.1%
Framing Effect
11.6%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
22.7%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
0%
Self-Serving Bias
59.7%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
37%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
34.3%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
11.6%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
74.1%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
42.6%
Appeal to Emotion
5.6%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
63%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

216 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.