Trump tells Michigan supports, 'I've done more for you than your parents' 98%

7/27/2026, 4:47:34 PM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, In-Group Bias, and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 43.8% saturation with 89 hits. Analysis detected 720 faulty-reasoning hits from 203 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 94.2% and a BS Rank of 98% (720 of 25,563 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 97.20% of the video peer group.

They've come a long way. 
It's amazing what tariffs will do for General Motors, wouldn't you and what the election has done. 
They're doing great. 
General Motors is doing fantastically, the best year they've ever had. 
And I won't get into it, but there's a reason. 
We've been very good to General Motors. 
And uh 
the rest of the world doesn't love me, but that's okay. 
It's called America first. 
All right. 
It's been amazing. 
General Motors, Mary Barra, as well as the president, Mark Reuss. 
>> AT LONG LAST, 
MICHIGAN FINALLY HAS A president who stands up for Michigan auto workers and puts America first. 
I can tell you the people that count, those people love Trump. 
Because I've done more for you than your parents, okay? Your parents are good. 
I'm not going to knock your parents, but 
I have been better to you than your parents. 
That I can tell you. And they would agree with me. 
Wherever they may be, they would agree. 
Today I'm proud to say that the auto industry is back and America is back and 
it's pulling Detroit and Michigan along with it. 
Confirmation Bias
24.6%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
7.4%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
3.4%
Framing Effect
23.6%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
25.1%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
6.9%
Self-Serving Bias
32%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
32%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
30%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
5.4%
Primacy Effect
2.5%
Blind-Spot Bias
4.9%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
14.8%
False Dilemma
5.4%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
5.9%
Hasty Generalization
11.3%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
20.2%
Appeal to Emotion
43.8%
Begging the Question
6.9%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
12.3%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
12.8%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
3.9%
Anecdotal
12.8%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
6.4%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

203 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.