New species named after Sir David Attenborough to celebrate his 100th birthday 100%

5/8/2026, 12:17:14 PM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Halo Effect, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 42.9% saturation with 99 hits. Analysis detected 732 faulty-reasoning hits from 231 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 100% (79 of 16,813 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 99.50% of the video peer group.

He's a broadcaster, natural history broadcaster primarily, 
[music] but even within the scientific community he is held with extremely high regard. 
That's both in terms of the content he's producing and well also the the way that that content is inspiring scientists 
[music] as well as other people. Astrophobia to kidna was named after him by 
>> [music] >> a scientist called Tim Flannery in 1998 when Tim described this species. 
And if you read the paper, you [music] will see the note on the naming that says something like the naming of the species in honor of Sir David Attenborough for the contributions [music] that he's made to conservation, 
broadcasting, and science. But that's just [music] one example of many species that are named after Sir David Attenborough. 
We thought it was really appropriate to honor Sir David Attenborough because this is quite a 
unique little wasp. It's a very different from anything that's at all closely related to it. So we named a whole new genus [music] 
because we think 
The little wasps that I study, there's tens of thousands of species all over the place. There's any number of undescribed species. 
[music] It's a little bit more uncommon to find a new genus that's been evolving in its own route for so many millions of years. 
Confirmation Bias
16.9%
Anchoring Bias
3%
Availability Heuristic
36.8%
Representativeness Heuristic
8.2%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
22.5%
Framing Effect
5.2%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
9.1%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
0%
Self-Serving Bias
6.9%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
28.6%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
6.5%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
42.9%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
17.7%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
21.2%
Begging the Question
1.3%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
10.8%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
22.9%
Appeal to Nature
10.4%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
18.6%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
27.3%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

231 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.