NTD100%

Trump Suggests Hosting World Cup Again: 'We'll Leave Mexico and Canada Out' 95%

7/18/2026, 12:32:45 AM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Burden of Proof, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 41.8% saturation with 64 hits. Analysis detected 652 faulty-reasoning hits from 153 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 92.2% and a BS Rank of 95% (947 of 17,593 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 94.60% of the video peer group.

I suggested that this has been so successful that and I'm you know I'm really working these people hard cuz they really call the shot. 
They tell Johnny exactly what to do. I say what we should do is you should choose the United States of America again. 
This time we'll leave Mexico and Canada out. 
But then what you do is you which I was very nice to get them in. 
But what we do is you leave you choose us but you pick somebody else for the next one and that will take some of the anger, hatred and steam out of everyone. 
But Johnny also had another idea. 
He said we could do it China 
and the United States for next time. We 
do them China United States. So you have a nice short flight in between games. 
Confirmation Bias
16.3%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
26.1%
Representativeness Heuristic
5.2%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
26.1%
Framing Effect
15%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
5.2%
Sunk Cost Effect
9.8%
Optimism Bias
21.6%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
26.8%
Self-Serving Bias
10.5%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
5.2%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
3.9%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
3.9%
Primacy Effect
16.3%
Blind-Spot Bias
15%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
15%
False Dilemma
10.5%
Slippery Slope
21.6%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
26.1%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
41.8%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
32%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
35.3%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
26.1%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
10.5%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

153 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.