NTD100%

Fetterman: During COVID People Trying to Balance Life and Economy 96%

7/30/2026, 4:00:26 PM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Availability Heuristic, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 39.8% saturation with 53 hits. Analysis detected 479 faulty-reasoning hits from 133 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 93.2% and a BS Rank of 96% (959 of 22,148 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 95.70% of the video peer group.

Dr. Fauci, I'm not here to perhaps attack you or defend or anything. It's 
really just just more 
honestly, I'm just want to acknowledge I have had members of my family die from COVID. 
And now I also grieve for people that I've met that have lost their business through the the pandemic and they'll never be in the same. 
Now, as 
during the pandemic, I was the lieutenant governor, so we were in the middle of of all of that maelstrom trying to find the right balance between protect life and protect the economics and for all of it. 
And I'm not sure if we got it all right or wrong. 
Um but without a doubt I can continue to question myself. 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
1.5%
Availability Heuristic
31.6%
Representativeness Heuristic
28.6%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
12%
Framing Effect
7.5%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
8.3%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
31.6%
Self-Serving Bias
10.5%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
10.5%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
7.5%
Blind-Spot Bias
9%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
28.6%
False Dilemma
37.6%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
28.6%
Appeal to Emotion
39.8%
Begging the Question
8.3%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
10.5%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
31.6%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
9%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
7.5%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

133 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.