NTD100%

Trump on Lindsey Graham: “He Never Quit” 99%

7/28/2026, 2:02:11 PM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, In-Group Bias, and Halo Effect, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 47.6% saturation with 81 hits. Analysis detected 572 faulty-reasoning hits from 170 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 98.4% and a BS Rank of 99% (339 of 25,427 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 98.70% of the video peer group.

From that pool hall where his parents raised him to the halls of the United 
States Senate where he was respected and loved, 
the son of South Carolina became 
one of the most important men in the most important country on Earth. 
In a city where politicians often become jaded and cynical, Lindsey Graham never lost the old-fashioned American idealism that brought him to the highest levels 
of government and life. 
He took his duty seriously without taking himself too seriously. 
He was unwavering in his seriously. 
principles, but always willing to listen. 
He always wanted to listen. 
And one thing about Lindsey that we all know, he never quit. 
You wanted him to quit. 
You waited for him to quit, but he would never quit. 
Above all, Lindsey Graham loved America and he believed in 
the American people. 
If you shared that view, you had a friend in Lindsey. 
If you didn't share it, there was no fiercer or more constant opponent. 
Confirmation Bias
7.1%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
7.6%
Representativeness Heuristic
3.5%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
47.6%
Framing Effect
20%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
5.9%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
7.6%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
2.9%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
34.7%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
30.6%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
6.5%
Primacy Effect
8.8%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
11.2%
False Dilemma
20.6%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
5.9%
Hasty Generalization
30%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
7.1%
Appeal to Emotion
46.5%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
4.7%
No True Scotsman
14.7%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
12.9%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

170 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.