NTD100%

Law Enforcement Reduced the Crime in Some Major Cities Dramatically! 99%

7/29/2026, 6:00:08 PM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Anecdotal, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 64 hits. Analysis detected 393 faulty-reasoning hits from 128 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 96.9% and a BS Rank of 99% (474 of 25,189 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 98.10% of the video peer group.

Amazing statistic. 2% of the people 
caused 91% of the cry and we can handle 
that really easily. So, they've done I 
just want to thank our great National 
Guard and the Metropolitan Police and 
others that worked with us. But, uh the 
job in Washington, everyone's talking 
about it. And I can also say in uh if 
you look at Memphis, Tennessee, where 
crime was rampant and it's down now 71% 
and it'll go down still further. And uh 
Louisiana, New Orleans, the governor 
called, he said, "We need help." And we 
gave him help and the crime is down 72%. 
And they just finished Marty Gigra and 
they said it was the safest Marty GR on 
Confirmation Bias
7%
Anchoring Bias
4.7%
Availability Heuristic
8.6%
Representativeness Heuristic
7%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
14.8%
Framing Effect
7.8%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
6.3%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
11.7%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
14.1%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
6.3%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
27.3%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
6.3%
Primacy Effect
4.7%
Blind-Spot Bias
7.8%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
11.7%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
6.3%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
7.8%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
3.9%
Appeal to Emotion
18.8%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
20.3%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
13.3%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
27.3%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
50%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
13.3%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

128 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.