NBC News⁠99%

Oh deer: Indiana firefighters rescue baby deer from rushing floodwater ⁠86%

5/28/2026, 11:51:53 PM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 26 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Halo Effect, and Anecdotal, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 58.4% saturation with 136 hits. Analysis detected 704 faulty-reasoning hits from 233 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 79.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠86% (2,432 of 16,813 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 85.50% of the video peer group.

AĀ floodedĀ streetĀ andĀ aĀ courageousĀ rescue.Ā 
That'sĀ CaptainĀ JoeĀ Sinclair,Ā aĀ firefighterĀ inĀ MorganĀ County,Ā Indiana.Ā 
YouĀ canĀ seeĀ himĀ battlingĀ theĀ fast-movingĀ water.Ā 
FirstĀ respondersĀ wereĀ onĀ theĀ sceneĀ helpingĀ aĀ personĀ trappedĀ inĀ aĀ carĀ 
afterĀ aĀ stormĀ whenĀ theyĀ heardĀ theĀ criesĀ ofĀ aĀ babyĀ deer.Ā 
ButĀ theyĀ knewĀ theyĀ couldn'tĀ leaveĀ itĀ behind.Ā 
CaptainĀ SinclairĀ bravingĀ theĀ floodsĀ toĀ catchĀ theĀ babyĀ deer,Ā carryingĀ itĀ toĀ safetyĀ withĀ theĀ helpĀ ofĀ hisĀ team.Ā 
>>Ā ButĀ onceĀ IĀ gotĀ myĀ footĀ inĀ andĀ IĀ linedĀ upĀ withĀ theĀ babyĀ deer,Ā IĀ knewĀ thatĀ thatĀ sheĀ wasĀ comingĀ toĀ me.Ā 
WeĀ tookĀ onĀ aĀ littleĀ bitĀ water,Ā butĀ youĀ know,Ā weĀ gotĀ weĀ gotĀ herĀ out.Ā 
SoĀ everybodyĀ wasĀ justĀ atĀ theĀ rightĀ placeĀ atĀ theĀ rightĀ times.Ā 
I'mĀ sureĀ sheĀ wasĀ relievedĀ justĀ asĀ wellĀ asĀ IĀ was.Ā 
>>Ā TheĀ firefightersĀ takingĀ theĀ deerĀ toĀ aĀ localĀ animalĀ shelter.Ā 
>>Ā StillĀ kindĀ ofĀ tryingĀ toĀ takeĀ itĀ allĀ in.Ā 
It'sĀ aĀ goodĀ story.Ā It'sĀ aĀ goodĀ outcome.Ā 
>>Ā ProudĀ ofĀ theirĀ unexpectedĀ save.Ā 
>>Ā IĀ feelĀ likeĀ anyĀ rescue'sĀ partĀ ofĀ myĀ jobĀ description,Ā youĀ know,Ā noĀ matterĀ whatĀ itĀ is.Ā 
>>Ā WeĀ thankĀ youĀ forĀ watchingĀ andĀ rememberĀ 
stayĀ updatedĀ onĀ breakingĀ newsĀ andĀ topĀ storiesĀ onĀ theĀ NBCĀ NewsĀ appĀ orĀ watchĀ liveĀ onĀ ourĀ YouTubeĀ channel.Ā 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
8.6%
Representativeness Heuristic
5.6%
Hindsight Bias
5.2%
Overconfidence Bias
18.9%
Framing Effect
7.7%
Loss Aversion
8.6%
Status Quo Bias
7.7%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
14.6%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
3%
Self-Serving Bias
27.9%
Fundamental Attribution Error
8.6%
Actor-Observer Bias
4.7%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
22.3%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
12.9%
Primacy Effect
4.3%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
4.3%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
7.7%
Hasty Generalization
7.7%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
12%
Appeal to Emotion
58.4%
Begging the Question
6.9%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
5.2%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
3.4%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
21%
No True Scotsman
6.9%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
8.2%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

233 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.