NBC News⁠99%

Candidates address supporters as L.A. votes in mayoral primary ⁠98%

6/3/2026, 12:51:18 AM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 29 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 64.3% saturation with 142 hits. Analysis detected 1,409 faulty-reasoning hits from 221 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 97.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠98% (528 of 21,887 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 97.60% of the video peer group.

WeĀ haveĀ ledĀ aĀ grassrootsĀ campaignĀ becauseĀ weĀ wantĀ toĀ bringĀ changeĀ toĀ ourĀ cityĀ andĀ THAT'SĀ WHATĀ WE'VEĀ BEENĀ DOINGĀ ANDĀ THAT'SĀ WHATĀ WE'REĀ GOINGĀ TOĀ CONTINUEĀ TOĀ DO.Ā 
WeĀ canĀ haveĀ theĀ cityĀ thatĀ weĀ knowĀ weĀ allĀ deserve.Ā 
LosĀ AngelesĀ isĀ whereĀ IĀ wasĀ bornĀ andĀ raised.Ā LosĀ AngelesĀ isĀ theĀ cityĀ thatĀ IĀ love.Ā 
OverĀ theseĀ lastĀ 3Ā andĀ 1/2Ā yearsĀ weĀ haveĀ laidĀ aĀ foundationĀ andĀ we'reĀ goingĀ toĀ buildĀ onĀ thatĀ foundationĀ becauseĀ weĀ knowĀ whatĀ aĀ cityĀ weĀ haveĀ andĀ whatĀ aĀ cityĀ weĀ canĀ be.Ā 
>>Ā I'mĀ anĀ AngelinoĀ whoĀ saidĀ enoughĀ isĀ enoughĀ andĀ IĀ hadĀ toĀ stepĀ up.Ā IĀ didn'tĀ knowĀ I'dĀ beĀ hereĀ tonight,Ā butĀ it'sĀ obviouslyĀ God'sĀ planĀ andĀ I'mĀ goingĀ toĀ goĀ allĀ theĀ wayĀ andĀ I'mĀ goingĀ toĀ showĀ everybodyĀ thatĀ I'mĀ theirĀ mayorĀ andĀ IĀ justĀ believeĀ there'sĀ aĀ lotĀ ofĀ LosĀ AngelesĀ thatĀ isĀ soĀ excitedĀ toĀ hear.Ā 
It'sĀ refreshingĀ aĀ non-politician.Ā MyĀ opponentsĀ whereĀ isĀ veryĀ clearĀ areĀ allĀ pathologicalĀ liars.Ā 
TheyĀ lieĀ onĀ allĀ theirĀ statistics.Ā TheyĀ lieĀ onĀ theĀ realityĀ ofĀ theĀ city.Ā 
IĀ willĀ beĀ takingĀ onĀ myĀ opponentsĀ withĀ factsĀ andĀ theĀ truthĀ andĀ theĀ votersĀ areĀ goingĀ toĀ seeĀ theĀ truth.Ā 
IĀ don'tĀ needĀ toĀ convinceĀ liarsĀ toĀ stopĀ lying.Ā 
Confirmation Bias
35.7%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
31.7%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
38.9%
Framing Effect
4.1%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
13.6%
Sunk Cost Effect
15.8%
Optimism Bias
32.6%
Pessimism Bias
27.6%
Negativity Bias
16.7%
Self-Serving Bias
50.7%
Fundamental Attribution Error
4.1%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
27.1%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
19%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
7.7%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
12.7%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
44.8%
False Dilemma
13.6%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
15.8%
Hasty Generalization
40.3%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
4.1%
Appeal to Emotion
64.3%
Begging the Question
29.4%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
27.6%
Tu Quoque
4.1%
Burden of Proof
15.8%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
23.5%
No True Scotsman
6.3%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
5%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
5%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

221 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.