'Don't worry, I got you': Spider-Man recounts helping a man in a wheelchair cross the street 96%

7/24/2026, 12:24:30 AM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 16 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 78.7% saturation with 137 hits. Analysis detected 773 faulty-reasoning hits from 174 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 93.1% and a BS Rank of 96% (946 of 20,853 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 95.50% of the video peer group.

And I would have done it with with or without the suit. 
I work at Ultimate Air. We do things for 
toddlers sometimes and that morning we had a superhero day and so I brought it for the toddlers and they had a blast. 
Everyone had had a blast. And whenever I got off work and clocked out, I was actually just going to head into town and just kind of drive around with the suit and I noticed that there was this man and he was in a wheelchair and he was having a lot of trouble. 
He wasn't going to make it but I just got out real fast and I just helped him along adrenaline pumping through me. 
I just told the man I said don't worry I got you and I guess he understood and I got him to a safe spot and I made it back to my vehicle and just drove off. 
Confirmation Bias
31%
Anchoring Bias
6.9%
Availability Heuristic
34.5%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
34.5%
Framing Effect
9.2%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
13.2%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
0%
Self-Serving Bias
34.5%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
31%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
5.2%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
44.3%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
43.7%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
13.2%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
26.4%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
31%
Anecdotal
78.7%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
6.9%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

174 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.