NTD100%

What does it take to be a Shen Yun dance? 99%

5/8/2026, 5:30:20 AM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Negativity Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 54.5% saturation with 79 hits. Analysis detected 578 faulty-reasoning hits from 145 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 99% (176 of 16,813 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 99.00% of the video peer group.

As an actor and a stage actor, I know 
what it's like to rehearse for eight eight shows a week, right for runs that last three, four, six, eight weeks. 
So, I understand the commitment, the physical commitment that goes into it. 
But, watching how these performers put every ounce of, you know, their physical being into it cuz it really is more than physical what they're doing. 
It's physical, it's psychological, it's mental, it's social. 
So, for me, I guess maybe it's the performer in me that's watching that and recognizing that and appreciating what they put into it. 
Uh it was just incredible to watch. 
It was just beautiful to watch how these dancers grow in this world and how they evolve and how they grow over these 20 years. 
It's really wonderful. 
Confirmation Bias
17.9%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
32.4%
Representativeness Heuristic
5.5%
Hindsight Bias
17.2%
Overconfidence Bias
20%
Framing Effect
6.9%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
6.9%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
35.2%
Self-Serving Bias
24.8%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
24.8%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
22.1%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
2.1%
Primacy Effect
6.2%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
14.5%
False Dilemma
6.9%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
17.2%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
24.1%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
54.5%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
46.9%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
5.5%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
6.9%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

145 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.