Why Orthodox Jews are opposing the new daylight saving bill in Congress 33%

By Yonat Shimron13%

7/16/2026, 5:24:31 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 87 hits. Analysis detected 884 faulty-reasoning hits from 585 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 41.4% and a BS Rank of 33% (11,704 of 17,313 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 67.60% of the article peer group.

Updated July 16, 2026 at 8:25 PM EDT 
(RNS)  Making daylight saving time permanent moved a step closer to reality this week, when the House of Representatives voted overwhelmingly to pass a measure to eliminate the annual clock-changing ritual. 
But some Orthodox Jewish organizations are fighting to prevent the bill from becoming law. 
The measure, called the Sunshine Protection Act, passed in a 308-117 vote in the House on Tuesday (July 14). 
It now heads to the Senate, where its passage is uncertain. 
President Donald Trump has championed the effort, describing on his Truth Social account moving the clocks forward and back as a "ridiculous, twice yearly production." 
If passed, the bill would give Americans an extra hour of sunshine in the evenings during the winter. 
But it would also push winter sunrises one hour later. 
That's of concern to Orthodox Jews, who pray three times a day, beginning with the Shacharit morning prayer service, which by tradition cannot begin in the dark. 
"The bottom line is, if prayers have to start an hour later that will have a direct effect on people getting to work and on when schools can start," said Rabbi A.D. 
Motzen, national director of government affairs for Agudath Israel of America, an organization representing U.S. 
Orthodox Jews. 
A constellation of other Orthodox Jewish groups also opposes the measure, including the Orthodox Union and the Coalition for Jewish Values. 
In Jewish law, some prayers, such as those in the morning service, can only be said communally, in a quorum of 10 Jewish adults, called a minyan. 
That requirement means going to synagogue every morning before heading out for work or school and saying prayers, such as the Shema, the central prayer of Jewish life, collectively. 
The morning service typically lasts 35 minutes but on some occasions can last close to an hour. 
"It becomes a communal issue when, for example, a synagogue that has had a morning prayer service for 100 years suddenly does not have a quorum of 10 men who can show up at the prayer time close to 9 o'clock because they have jobs," Motzen said. 
Motzen, who works in the Washington, D.C., office of Agudath Israel, said the organization already has the support of Sen. 
Tom Cotton, R-Ark., who last year objected to fast-tracking the bill. 
Orthodox Jews are not the only constituencies opposed to the change. 
Some medical and health advocates argue that the human body's internal clock is better aligned with the sun during standard time rather than daylight saving time. 
School boards and parents are also concerned about children walking to school in pitch-black conditions during winter mornings. 
That latter concern, which Motzen described as a safety issue, is one Orthodox Jews share as well. 
Making daylight saving time permanent would make sunrise after 8 a.m. in most parts of the country, and after 9 a.m. in a few select places. 
For example, according to a list compiled by Agudath Israel, sunrise would take place after 9 a.m., (and as late as 9:13 a.m.) for 55 days a year in South Bend, Indiana. 
In Detroit, Michigan, sunrise would take place after 9 a.m. for 23 days a year. 
Hawaii and most of Arizona abide by standard time year round, as do Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, the U.S. 
Virgin Islands and the Northern Mariana Islands. 
This story was produced through a collaboration between NPR and Religion News Service. 
Copyright 2026 NPR 
Confirmation Bias
12%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
3.6%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
5%
Framing Effect
2.1%
Loss Aversion
4.8%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
3.1%
Pessimism Bias
4.4%
Negativity Bias
7.4%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
2.9%
In-Group Bias
5.3%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
1.9%
Primacy Effect
5.5%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
14.9%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
11.6%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
7.4%
Begging the Question
5.5%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
9.6%
Anecdotal
8%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
4.4%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
4.4%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
9.9%
Quote-first Misdirection
4.3%
Biased Writer Voice
7.9%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
5.5%

585 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.