‘We weren’t at fault’: British yacht couple bristle at ‘armchair sailors’ and Russian denials 52%

By Steven Morris0%

7/16/2026, 1:00:39 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 17 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.1% saturation with 121 hits. Analysis detected 550 faulty-reasoning hits from 668 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 50.9% and a BS Rank of 52% (8,174 of 16,722 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 51.10% of the article peer group.

They found themselves at the centre of an international incident, the close encounter between their small sailing boat and a Russian warship making headlines around the world. 
A month later, Jane and Alan Kelvey are to be found berthed in a rainy harbour in north-west France, still taken aback by their brush with Vladimir Putin’s forces  but trying to get on with their fun sailing trip. 
“I was surprised about the amount of interest, to be honest,” Jane told the Guardian. 
“That was a real shock. 
But we’re fine, really. 
Nothing terrible happened.” 
The Kelveys bristle at the idea, put out by Russia and “armchair sailors” who have “trolled them”, that they did something wrong. 
“We weren’t at fault,” Jane said. 
Happily, there have been no fresh encounters with ships from hostile nations; poor weather rather than battleships firing warning shots have been their main challenge since. 
“We’ve just been sailing around,” said Jane. 
“We’re out here for another few weeks. 
It’s pouring with rain. 
Throwing it down, thunder and lightning.” 
Jane, 69, and Alan, 71, who retired from the successful signage business they had built from scratch, were a few hours into a two-month sailing trip on their 12-metre (40ft) boat Bright Future when they became embroiled in the international incident. 
They were about halfway across the Channel when a much larger vessel loomed ahead. 
“Because we berth her [Bright Future] in Portsmouth, we see warships all the time,” said Jane. 
“When we were approaching, and when we realised it was a warship, we just assumed it was French or British. 
“We never in a million years thought it would be a Russian warship. 
It wasn’t until we got much closer that we realised it was Russian. 
You don’t expect to find them in the English Channel.” 
The ship was the Admiral Grigorovich, a 125-metre (409ft) Russian frigate. 
The warship sounded its horn then fired warning shots with what Jane described as “whip-crack” sounds. 
She took cover while Alan steered Bright Future away from the Admiral Grigorovich. 
They weren’t really frightened. 
“It was obviously a surprise,” Jane said. 
During long hours of sailing since, they have replayed what happened and studied the different versions that have been put forward. 
Moscow claimed the yacht had been heading towards the frigate on a “dangerous course”, which the Kelveys say is wrong. 
Keir Starmer said the Russian vessel had been drifting and described the Russian actions as “reckless”. 
Jane said: “I don’t think I made a big enough point about it at the time but if they were adrift, they should have been displaying day shapes [signals indicating a vessel’s operational status] and they weren’t.” 
They have chatted through what happened with fellow sailors. 
“From what I’ve heard, they didn’t have their engines on  they’re trying to save fuel. 
We refuel at sea, but they’re not very good at that, apparently.” 
Asked what she thought about the Russians, Jane said: “Not a lot, really. 
I mean, they obviously did the wrong thing.” 
A UK government defence minster phoned the couple to check they were all right. 
“We haven’t had any more contact from the MoD [Ministry of Defence],” Jane said. 
They read with interest the UK government’s announcement that an extra £15bn was being invested to fund “key equipment and technology” for armed forces. 
“We’re quite happy about that,” Jane said. 
“I don’t think that was us, to be fair. 
But, you know, it may have helped.” 
Jane said she almost had a heart attack two days after the encounter when she remembered that in recent years they have flown a Ukrainian flag on Bright Future. 
“Ever since 2022, I’ve flown a Ukraine courtesy flag on our yacht,” Jane said. 
“I didn’t put it up this year.” 
They told a fellow sailor who was ex-military about this. 
“This guy covered his face and said: “Oh, my God, that could have been a different outcome.” 
Confirmation Bias
8.5%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
3.4%
Representativeness Heuristic
3%
Hindsight Bias
3.1%
Overconfidence Bias
2.4%
Framing Effect
18.1%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
1.6%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
0%
Self-Serving Bias
5.2%
Fundamental Attribution Error
1.2%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
3.3%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
3.7%
Halo Effect
6.1%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
3.3%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
7.3%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
6.9%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
2.4%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
2.5%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

668 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.