Gizmodo63%

The Future of OLED Screens May Be... Inkjet Printing? 80%

By Kyle Barr80%

7/17/2026, 8:15:23 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 41.5% saturation with 209 hits. Analysis detected 1,419 faulty-reasoning hits from 504 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 71.9% and a BS Rank of 80% (3,625 of 17,302 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 79.10% of the article peer group.

Contrast-rich OLED displays sure are pretty, but they’re also still too pricey. 
TCL may have the remedy we’ve been waiting for—a new, cheaper way to make OLED screens for laptops thanks to “inkjet printing.” 
No, it’s not like your at-home paper printer… Okay, it’s kind of like your printer. 
On Thursday, TCL CSOT shared details of a new China-exclusive laptop, the Lenovo Legion R9000P, complete with a 16-inch OLED display made by TCL’s touted “IJP”—aka inkjet printing—manufacturing process. 
The laptop screen supposedly hits a max 240Hz refresh rate, though neither company is sharing much else about the laptop specs. 
Lenovo sells several different Legion R9000 laptops in the Asian market. 
All that matters is the screen, or, really, how TCL helped make the display. 
Organic light-emitting diode displays make use of thousands of individual self-emissive lights that can display red, green, and blue colors. 
Most OLEDs are constructed using a vacuum thermal evaporation process that relied on so-called fine metal masks (FMM) to pattern the organic substrates. 
It’s a complicated and often wasteful process that requires specialized factories to make these screens. 
TCL said that using inkjet printing is more efficient and lower-cost since it doesn’t use an FMM or waste as much material. 
We may see more than just laptops sporting IJP OLED. 
This week, fellow laptop maker MSI showcased its MSI PRO MAX OLED 271UPJW12 monitor. 
It’s a 27-inch, 4K screen that hits all the notes you expect, including a 120Hz refresh rate and RGB stripe technology (which reduces fuzziness around text) and promises a 1,000 nits peak brightness in HDR (300 nits typical, though). 
It would be one of the first commercial-end monitors made using IJP. 
There’s still a Reddit thread showcasing the monitor, though MSI inexplicably took down the product page. 
Hopefully, it won’t be too long since we see this monitor or the Lenovo laptop for ourselves. 
TCL has been proclaiming the inkjet-printing OLED future for years now. 
Hell, we’ve known about this method of OLED manufacturing for more than a decade. 
Back in 2023, the China-based screen maker showcased a folding TV-sized OLED screen made using inkjet printing. 
In 2024, TCL claimed it finally managed a “breakthrough” in inkjet OLED manufacturing, promising better image quality and overall OLED lifespan. 
TCL is known mostly for its relatively affordable TVs, so much so that it claims around a 14% market share in the TV space, according to Counterpoint Research. 
The brand relies on LCD and mini LED screens for the vast majority of its televisions. 
Pushing a new blend of OLED, one made by TCL, would finally let the TV maker stretch its wings and compete against the likes of Samsung and LG for smaller screens. 
Eventually, TCL may even try to push cheaper OLED TVs. 
In a time where every other laptop component is getting way too expensive, at least we can agree that cheaper OLED displays will be one spot of good news in a tapestry of dire tidings. 
Confirmation Bias
12.9%
Anchoring Bias
2.4%
Availability Heuristic
7.1%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
2.8%
Framing Effect
5.8%
Loss Aversion
6.9%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
23.4%
Pessimism Bias
6.9%
Negativity Bias
20.4%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
16.1%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
5%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
26.8%
False Dilemma
8.9%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
13.1%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
21.8%
Begging the Question
4.2%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
4.4%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
3.2%
Anecdotal
6.5%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
3%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
19.8%
Quote-first Misdirection
0.4%
Biased Writer Voice
41.5%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
18.3%

504 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.