Kevin O'Leary says Utah AI data center project will shrink after lawmakers demand cuts 19%

By Greg Wehner0%

6/4/2026, 5:07:52 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 26 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Ad Hominem, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 83 hits. Analysis detected 820 faulty-reasoning hits from 509 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 33.9% and a BS Rank of 19% (17,786 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 81.30% of the article peer group.

"Shark Tank" investor Kevin O'Leary says he is prepared to shrink a sprawling artificial intelligence data center development in Utah after top state lawmakers pushed for major reductions and additional environmental safeguards, according to reports. 
O'Leary told NBC News on Wednesday that he is willing to reduce the size of the proposed Stratos data center project after Utah Senate President J. 
Stuart Adams called for a 75% reduction in its footprint. 
"I have no choice," O'Leary told NBC News at the Washington AI Network's AI Honors gala. 
The project, which has been promoted as one of the largest AI-focused data center developments in the world, would span roughly 40,000 acres in Box Elder County. 
KEVIN O'LEARY DETAILS MASSIVE UTAH AI DATA CENTER TO RIVAL CHINA'S TECH DOMINANCE 
In a letter sent Monday, Adams urged O'Leary to reduce the project area to approximately 10,000 acres and adopt additional environmental safeguards before moving forward. 
"I've sent a letter directly to Kevin O'Leary calling for a 75% reduction in the proposed data center project area, from 40,000 acres to approximately 10,000 acres," Adams said in a statement. 
The Republican Senate president also called for stronger conservation measures, greater public transparency and protections for Utah's natural resources. 
FOX NEWS AI NEWSLETTER: BACKLASH OVER MYSTERY COMPANY'S DATA CENTER 
Among his requests, Adams said the project should commit to using the latest technology to minimize water consumption, dedicate any excess treated water to the Great Salt Lake and enter into agreements with state officials to preserve wildlife habitat and agricultural land. 
"Utah can pursue economic opportunity while protecting our water, air, wildlife and communities," Adams said. 
"We can and must do both." 
O'Leary suggested the demand was driven in part by political pressure as opposition to the project continues to grow. 
KEVIN O'LEARY REVEALS THE ONLY TWO CRYPTOCURRENCIES HE SAYS ARE WORTH OWNING 
"I know he did it for political reasons," O'Leary told NBC News. 
"He has to address those issues, and so do I." 
Residents and environmental advocates have raised concerns about the project's potential demands on water supplies, power infrastructure and nearby communities. 
O'Leary has previously dismissed some of those concerns as misinformation and accused opponents of spreading false claims about the project. 
US BANS NEW FOREIGN-MADE CONSUMER INTERNET ROUTERS OVER SECURITY CONCERNS 
"All these people have a right to get information," O'Leary told NBC News. 
"Why are they getting it from a false initiative? 
Who is spending all this money to put out all these falsehoods and straight-out misinformation and lies and agitate these people?" 
Adams noted that several legislative committees are examining how large-scale developments could affect Utah's water supply, energy system, land use and environmental resources. 
GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE 
Utah has also invested more than $1 billion in water conservation and infrastructure projects while increasing oversight of large-scale developments, Adams said. 
O'Leary told NBC News he plans to formally respond to Adams by Friday with details of a revised proposal. 
Confirmation Bias
15.5%
Anchoring Bias
11.2%
Availability Heuristic
5.3%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
2.4%
Framing Effect
5.3%
Loss Aversion
3.1%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
4.3%
Optimism Bias
9.4%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
16.3%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
2.4%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
3.7%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
2%
Blind-Spot Bias
3.9%
Ad Hominem
14.1%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
9.6%
False Dilemma
2.4%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
8.1%
Begging the Question
2.9%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
2%
Burden of Proof
2.4%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
2.9%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
3.1%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
7.3%
Biased Writer Voice
12.2%
Indoctrination
1.2%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
8.1%

509 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.