WIRED39%

There Are 2 Eclipses This August. Here’s How to See Them 8%

By Javier Carbajal29%

8/2/2026, 3:30:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 10 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Availability Heuristic, and Halo Effect, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 47 hits. Analysis detected 228 faulty-reasoning hits from 568 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 17% and a BS Rank of 8% (28,292 of 30,584 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 92.50% of the article peer group.

They include a full solar eclipse on August 12 and a partial lunar eclipse on August 27 and 28. 
Catch one—or both—of these eclipses if you can: They’ll be the last ones of 2026, as the other two have already taken place. 
We’ve got all the details on what to expect, the path of each August eclipse, and how to watch the celestial happenings. 
Solar Eclipse on August 12 
The first eclipse of the month will be a total solar eclipse. 
This occurs when the moon passes between Earth and the sun. 
The August solar eclipse will be visible in the northern hemisphere. 
Path: The moon’s shadow will travel from west to east, beginning in the Arctic. 
Parts of Alaska will be treated to a partial view of the eclipse, as well as other northerly locations including Canada, Iceland, and parts of the North Atlantic. 
Some locations in Europe and the eastern US will also get a glimpse of the eclipse. 
Only a few areas on land will get to see totality, though. 
Sparsely populated stretches of eastern Greenland will see the sun completely obscured, as will the far western edge of Iceland. 
Spain is the most populated region in the path of totality. 
It’s the first time the Iberian Peninsula will be treated to a full solar eclipse in more than a century. 
How to view it: For one, not with your naked eye! 
For areas in the path of totality, the eclipse will reach its peak in the late afternoon. 
That’s an idea and dramatic time for viewing, when the sun is low on the horizon. 
Again, just not with your naked eye! 
Times vary slightly by city, but in almost all of Spain the eclipse will occur at sunset, with totality around 8:30 pm Central European Time. 
From start to finish, the eclipse will last about an hour; totality is expected to last about two minutes. 
Lunar Eclipse on August 27–28 
The second eclipse of the month will be a partial lunar eclipse, which occurs when the Earth comes between the sun and the moon. 
A portion of the lunar surface will remain lit while the rest of the disk darkens or takes on a reddish hue. 
Path: Unlike a solar eclipse, a lunar eclipse does not follow a narrow path across the Earth. 
The partial lunar eclipse will be visible simultaneously across a vast region of the planet. 
However, the eclipse will be best viewed across the Americas, primarily in eastern and central Canada, the US, and Mexico, as well as throughout Central America, the Caribbean, and South America. 
While the eclipse is partial, up to 96 percent of the lunar disk will be in the Earth’s shadow, making for a dramatic view. 
How to view it: In the Americas, the eclipse will begin in the late hours of August 27 and last until the early morning of August 28. 
For example, in Mexico City, the partial phase will begin at 8:30 pm local time, the peak will occur around 10:13 pm, and the partial phase will end at 11:53 pm. 
To view it, you just need to be in an area with clear skies and minimal light pollution. 
The farther you are from a major city, the better. 
This story originally appeared on WIRED en Español and has been translated from Spanish. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Javier Carbajal: 1.4%WIRED: 1.7%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Javier Carbajal: 0.7%WIRED: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 4.2%Javier Carbajal: 2.2%WIRED: 2.8%Availability Heuristic4.2%This article: 0.0%Javier Carbajal: 0.0%WIRED: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Javier Carbajal: 0.2%WIRED: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 3.9%Javier Carbajal: 1.5%WIRED: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias3.9%This article: 8.3%Javier Carbajal: 4.0%WIRED: 3.3%Framing Effect8.3%This article: 0.0%Javier Carbajal: 0.8%WIRED: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 1.8%Javier Carbajal: 0.6%WIRED: 0.4%Status Quo Bias1.8%This article: 0.0%Javier Carbajal: 0.0%WIRED: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 2.8%Javier Carbajal: 2.5%WIRED: 2.0%Optimism Bias2.8%This article: 0.0%Javier Carbajal: 2.3%WIRED: 1.3%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 2.1%Javier Carbajal: 4.2%WIRED: 5.3%Negativity Bias2.1%This article: 0.0%Javier Carbajal: 2.1%WIRED: 1.1%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Javier Carbajal: 0.6%WIRED: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Javier Carbajal: 0.0%WIRED: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Javier Carbajal: 0.0%WIRED: 0.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Javier Carbajal: 0.0%WIRED: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 4.2%Javier Carbajal: 0.6%WIRED: 1.5%Halo Effect4.2%This article: 0.0%Javier Carbajal: 0.0%WIRED: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Javier Carbajal: 0.0%WIRED: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.0%Javier Carbajal: 0.7%WIRED: 0.9%Recency Bias4.0%This article: 0.0%Javier Carbajal: 0.4%WIRED: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Javier Carbajal: 0.0%WIRED: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Javier Carbajal: 0.0%WIRED: 0.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Javier Carbajal: 0.0%WIRED: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Javier Carbajal: 2.1%WIRED: 2.6%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Javier Carbajal: 0.6%WIRED: 1.0%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Javier Carbajal: 1.1%WIRED: 0.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Javier Carbajal: 0.5%WIRED: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Javier Carbajal: 1.3%WIRED: 4.1%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Javier Carbajal: 0.0%WIRED: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Javier Carbajal: 0.0%WIRED: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Javier Carbajal: 3.6%WIRED: 2.5%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Javier Carbajal: 0.2%WIRED: 0.3%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Javier Carbajal: 0.5%WIRED: 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Javier Carbajal: 0.0%WIRED: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Javier Carbajal: 1.1%WIRED: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Javier Carbajal: 0.0%WIRED: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Javier Carbajal: 0.1%WIRED: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Javier Carbajal: 0.0%WIRED: 2.9%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Javier Carbajal: 0.0%WIRED: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Javier Carbajal: 0.9%WIRED: 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Javier Carbajal: 0.0%WIRED: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Javier Carbajal: 0.0%WIRED: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Javier Carbajal: 0.2%WIRED: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Javier Carbajal: 0.2%WIRED: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Javier Carbajal: 0.0%WIRED: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.5%Javier Carbajal: 1.7%WIRED: 1.0%Unattributed Quote2.5%This article: 0.0%Javier Carbajal: 0.6%WIRED: 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Javier Carbajal: 2.6%WIRED: 3.1%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 6.3%Javier Carbajal: 2.3%WIRED: 0.7%Indoctrination6.3%This article: 0.0%Javier Carbajal: 0.0%WIRED: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Javier Carbajal: 0.0%WIRED: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Javier Carbajal: 1.4%WIRED: 1.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

568 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker2.5%attributed speech554writer words
Selected voice

WIRED en Español

100%flagged-word coverage
14 attributed words100% of attributed speech31% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%WIRED en Español: 100.0%100.0%Indoctrination-6.5 ptsWriter: 6.5%WIRED en Español: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.