Behind the Gun: The conversation Milwaukee needs to have | Opinion 5%

By James E. Causey0%

8/9/2026, 3:03:08 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Optimism Bias, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.5% saturation with 185 hits. Analysis detected 1,284 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,056 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 11.9% and a BS Rank of 5% (29,297 of 30,584 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 95.80% of the article peer group.

In 2016, Vee Taylor-Tate's family experienced every parent's nightmare when one of her 6-year-old cousins found a gun inside the family home and accidentally shot his 9-year-old brother. 
The boy survived, but the trauma never left her family. 
For years afterward, the sound of that gunshot remained a reminder of how quickly a moment of carelessness could change a family forever. 
For many people, an experience like that would have created a lifelong fear of firearms. 
Instead, it inspired Taylor-Tate to learn everything she could about them. 
She became a certified firearms instructor and now teaches dozens of women across southeastern Wisconsin how to properly handle firearms, protect themselves and, most importantly, not fear them. 
"In Milwaukee there is a lot of trauma related to guns and gun violence," Taylor-Tate said. 
"I'm trying to give people, mostly women, a different way of thinking about guns." 
Taylor-Tate, 37, a firearms instructor at Prolific Arms, believes the conversation around gun violence needs to expand beyond simply blaming the weapon. 
She wants people to talk more about conflict resolution  or the lack of it  and why arguments and disagreements so often escalate into deadly violence. 
Taylor-Tate will be one of the panelists at the "Behind the Gun: Milwaukee Gun Owners' Safety Summit," which I will co-moderate Aug. 22 at Evolve Church, 6550 N. 76th St. 
The free event will be held from 10 a.m. to 1 p.m. 
Doors open at 9:30 a.m. 
Register: Get free tickets for Aug. 
22 Behind the Gun event 
It is the second such event co-hosted by the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel and Marquette University's O'Brien Fellowship on Public Service Journalism. 
Prince Hall hosted a safety summit in March, which I also moderated. 
The events, which also were held in Wausau, grew out of fellow reporter John Diedrich's 'Behind the Gun' series, which sought to reframe firearms issues, focusing on stories and solutions from gun owners. 
The summits are bringing together gun owners, community leaders and safety advocates for conversations about responsible gun ownership, violence prevention and finding solutions to one of Milwaukee's most pressing challenges. 
The event also will include breakout sessions for young people led by professionals who will discuss what to do if they encounter a firearm while providing a safe space for honest conversations about their experiences with guns. 
Other panelists include Trell Johnson, a neighborhood organizer at Safe & Sound; Theron Roger, co-owner of Prolific Arms, director of business development and firearms instructor for adults and children; and Kevin Simmons, youth mentor and pastor. 
Conflict resolution matters as much as gun ownership 
Taylor-Tate said the purpose of the summit is to change the conversation about guns, helping law-abiding citizens move beyond the trauma surrounding gun violence and toward discussions about responsible gun ownership for home protection, personal safety and sport. 
Her perspective resonates with me because I grew up around guns. 
On my grandparents' farm in the South, a gun was considered a tool, no different than a shovel or a tractor. 
My grandfather took one with him nearly everywhere he went, and he bought me my first gun when I was about 12 years old. 
Some of my favorite memories with him were going deer and squirrel hunting together, although I was never nearly the marksman he was. 
One thing he drilled into me was never to play around with a gun and always to treat every firearm as if it were loaded. 
My father shared that same philosophy. 
He always kept guns in the house, much to my mother's dismay. 
Today, I'm helping my wife overcome her fear of guns by teaching her about safe, responsible firearm ownership. 
I also encouraged her to take a gun safety course to help her become more comfortable around firearms. 
As someone who has spent years writing about gun violence in Milwaukee, I've learned there are few issues more polarizing than gun safety. 
Conversations like this won't solve the problem overnight, but refusing to have them certainly won't either. 
In addition to the panel discussion, the summit will include spaces where young people can talk openly about their experiences with guns. 
Because owning a firearm comes with enormous responsibility  and because every year hundreds of firearms are stolen from vehicles in Milwaukee, many after being left unsecured  Prolific Guns will distribute 1,000 free vehicle firearm lockboxes, provide training on how to use them properly, installing them in cars that day, and offer 50 free firearm safety and concealed carry (CCW) course seats. 
A resource fair also will connect attendees with organizations focused on violence prevention, youth mentoring, mental health and trauma support, family services, employment, reentry, faith-based support and public safety education. 
If you've ever had questions about guns, this is a conversation worth being part of. 
I understand that people have very different views on firearms, and far too many of us know someone whose life has been touched by gun violence. 
But in many cases, the problem is not simply the presence of a firearm. 
It is what happens when guns are handled irresponsibly, stored improperly or placed in the hands of people who should never have access to them. 
Responsible gun ownership means understanding that owning a firearm is a serious responsibility  one that requires training, proper storage and respect for the power of the weapon. 
Taylor-Tate, whose husband is legally prohibited from possessing firearms because he is a convicted felon, said responsible ownership also means recognizing that not everyone should have access to guns. 
She takes extra precautions in her own home to ensure he cannot access where her firearms are securely stored. 
Whether you own a gun, are thinking about buying one, or simply want to better understand the role firearms play in our community, this summit is an opportunity to learn, ask questions and hear perspectives you may not have considered. 
We may never all agree on guns, but we should all be able to agree on one thing: Every life lost to gun violence is one too many. 
If changing the conversation leads to more responsible gun ownership, safer storage and fewer families having to bury a loved one, then that's a conversation Milwaukee can't afford not to have. 
Reach James E. 
Causey at jcausey@jrn.com; follow him on X @jecausey. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.8%James E. Causey: 0.0%Journal Sentinel: 1.2%Confirmation Bias6.8%This article: 0.0%James E. Causey: 0.0%Journal Sentinel: 0.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 9.3%James E. Causey: 0.0%Journal Sentinel: 1.7%Availability Heuristic9.3%This article: 3.4%James E. Causey: 0.7%Journal Sentinel: 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic3.4%This article: 0.0%James E. Causey: 0.0%Journal Sentinel: 0.2%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 2.2%James E. Causey: 0.0%Journal Sentinel: 1.0%Overconfidence Bias2.2%This article: 17.5%James E. Causey: 0.0%Journal Sentinel: 2.5%Framing Effect17.5%This article: 2.9%James E. Causey: 0.0%Journal Sentinel: 0.4%Loss Aversion2.9%This article: 0.0%James E. Causey: 0.0%Journal Sentinel: 0.2%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%James E. Causey: 0.0%Journal Sentinel: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 10.6%James E. Causey: 1.5%Journal Sentinel: 0.7%Optimism Bias10.6%This article: 0.0%James E. Causey: 0.0%Journal Sentinel: 0.5%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 3.3%James E. Causey: 1.1%Journal Sentinel: 3.6%Negativity Bias3.3%This article: 2.8%James E. Causey: 0.5%Journal Sentinel: 0.7%Self-Serving Bias2.8%This article: 2.7%James E. Causey: 0.0%Journal Sentinel: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error2.7%This article: 0.0%James E. Causey: 0.0%Journal Sentinel: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%James E. Causey: 0.0%Journal Sentinel: 0.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%James E. Causey: 0.0%Journal Sentinel: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 4.8%James E. Causey: 1.1%Journal Sentinel: 1.5%Halo Effect4.8%This article: 0.0%James E. Causey: 0.0%Journal Sentinel: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%James E. Causey: 0.0%Journal Sentinel: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%James E. Causey: 0.0%Journal Sentinel: 0.8%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%James E. Causey: 0.0%Journal Sentinel: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 2.5%James E. Causey: 0.0%Journal Sentinel: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias2.5%This article: 0.0%James E. Causey: 0.0%Journal Sentinel: 0.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%James E. Causey: 0.7%Journal Sentinel: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 2.0%James E. Causey: 0.0%Journal Sentinel: 0.9%Appeal to Authority2.0%This article: 4.9%James E. Causey: 0.8%Journal Sentinel: 1.0%False Dilemma4.9%This article: 0.0%James E. Causey: 0.0%Journal Sentinel: 0.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%James E. Causey: 0.0%Journal Sentinel: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 3.6%James E. Causey: 0.0%Journal Sentinel: 1.8%Hasty Generalization3.6%This article: 0.0%James E. Causey: 0.0%Journal Sentinel: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%James E. Causey: 0.0%Journal Sentinel: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 8.7%James E. Causey: 0.0%Journal Sentinel: 4.1%Appeal to Emotion8.7%This article: 0.0%James E. Causey: 0.0%Journal Sentinel: 0.4%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 2.9%James E. Causey: 0.0%Journal Sentinel: 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)2.9%This article: 0.0%James E. Causey: 0.0%Journal Sentinel: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%James E. Causey: 0.0%Journal Sentinel: 0.2%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%James E. Causey: 0.0%Journal Sentinel: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%James E. Causey: 0.0%Journal Sentinel: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 14.6%James E. Causey: 0.0%Journal Sentinel: 1.4%Anecdotal14.6%This article: 0.0%James E. Causey: 0.0%Journal Sentinel: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%James E. Causey: 0.0%Journal Sentinel: 0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%James E. Causey: 0.0%Journal Sentinel: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.7%James E. Causey: 0.0%Journal Sentinel: 0.1%Middle Ground2.7%This article: 0.0%James E. Causey: 0.0%Journal Sentinel: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%James E. Causey: 0.0%Journal Sentinel: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%James E. Causey: 0.0%Journal Sentinel: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.5%James E. Causey: 0.0%Journal Sentinel: 0.4%Unattributed Quote1.5%This article: 0.0%James E. Causey: 0.0%Journal Sentinel: 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%James E. Causey: 0.0%Journal Sentinel: 0.7%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 1.3%James E. Causey: 2.6%Journal Sentinel: 0.8%Indoctrination1.3%This article: 0.0%James E. Causey: 0.0%Journal Sentinel: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%James E. Causey: 0.0%Journal Sentinel: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 10.5%James E. Causey: 3.0%Journal Sentinel: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…10.5%

1056 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker16%attributed speech891writer words
Selected voice

Taylor-Tate

100%flagged-word coverage
165 attributed words100% of attributed speech76% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -12.5 ptsWriter: 12.5%Taylor-Tate: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote+9.7 ptsWriter: 0.0%Taylor-Tate: 9.7%9.7%Indoctrination+8.5 ptsWriter: 0.0%Taylor-Tate: 8.5%8.5%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.