Anthony Edwards returns with a late flourish for the Timberwolves in a clutch win over the Thunder74%

By The Associated Press74%

12/20/2025, 2:10:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 17 faulty reasoning types, including Hindsight Bias, Optimism Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 26.6% saturation with 138 hits. Analysis detected 775 faulty-reasoning hits from 518 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 67% and a BS Rank of 74% (4,397 of 16,813 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 73.90% of the article peer group.

Minnesota Timberwolves guard Anthony Edwards celebrates his three-point basket against the Oklahoma City Thunder during the second half of an NBA basketball game Dec. 19 in Minneapolis. 
The Minnesota Timberwolves kept possession, trailing by two in the final minute, and Anthony Edwards knew exactly what he was doing next. 
After teammate Julius Randle made his first free throw and missed the second, Rudy Gobert leaped to tap the ball into the backcourt and help keep the Wolves within reach of Oklahoma City on Friday night. 
Edwards quickly took possession, steered Thunder guard Cason Wallace toward the wing, faked a drive, and swished a 25-foot step-back 3-pointer with 38.5 seconds left to give the Wolves the lead for good in a 112-107 victory. 
“I’m not passing the ball. 
I knew it was going up,” said Edwards, who returned from a three-game injury absence with 26 points and 12 rebounds. 
When it left my hand, I knew it was going in. 
He played great defense. 
It was a tough shot. 
But I probably shoot that shot 1,000 times in a week when I’m in the gym, so it felt like a natural shot.” 
Edwards, who's been managing a foot injury, said there was no doubt in his mind he would play against the Thunder, who ousted the Wolves in five games in the Western Conference finals last spring and beat them 113-105 in Oklahoma City last month. 
“At the end of the day, we’re putting the ball in his hands, asking him to bring us home,” said Donte DiVincenzo, who had 15 points. 
That’s exactly what he did.” 
Edwards didn't stop with the hero shot, either. 
He blocked reigning NBA MVP Shai Gilgeous-Alexander's shot at the rim on the next possession and grabbed the defensive rebound after the Thunder hung onto the ball for another try, setting up Randle for two free throws that put the Wolves up by three. 
Then as Gilgeous-Alexander drove up the court, Edwards saw teammate and defensive ace Jaden McDaniels in the gap on Gilgeous-Alexander's left, made sure to cut off his path to the right, and swiped the ball as it crossed his face. 
“I knew he was trying to go for a 3,” Edwards said. 
“Just trying to be solid.” 
Edwards, sitting in front of his locker after the game, then added the relevant levity to the revelry of handing the Thunder (25-3) a rare loss. 
“That’s just one win, man. 
That’s a regular-season win,” said Edwards, also noting the Thunder had played at home the night before. 
“They're the best team in the league by far.” 
But the defending champions clearly brought out the best in the Wolves (17-10), who might well have produced their best performance of the young season in terms of the opponent, the meaning, their energy and their defense  offsetting a rough night shooting from the floor and the foul line. 
“You could feel every defensive stop, every rebound, every offensive rebound. 
You could feel how much energy the arena had, the ball had, the teammates had,” DiVincenzo said. 
That’s the atmosphere we need every single night.” 
Actor-Observer Bias
3.3%
Anchoring Bias
1.7%
Availability Heuristic
9.8%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Confirmation Bias
17.2%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Framing Effect
9.7%
Fundamental Attribution Error
3.3%
Halo Effect
7.5%
Hindsight Bias
23.4%
Horn Effect
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Loss Aversion
0%
Negativity Bias
0%
Optimism Bias
18.1%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
1.7%
Overconfidence Bias
26.6%
Pessimism Bias
6%
Primacy Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Self-Serving Bias
13.9%
Status Quo Bias
1%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Anecdotal
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Bandwagon
3.3%
Begging the Question
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Composition/Division
0%
False Dilemma
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Hasty Generalization
1.5%
Middle Ground
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
1.5%
Red Herring
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Straw Man
0%
Tu Quoque
0%

518 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.