Gizmodo⁠76%

SpaceX Stock Drops After First Earnings Call as Musk Fails to Woo Investors With AI Goals ⁠58%

By Ece Yildirim⁠87%

8/4/2026, 5:03:46 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 7 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Optimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 44.6% saturation with 292 hits. Analysis detected 736 faulty-reasoning hits from 654 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 48.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (11,491 of 27,321 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 57.90% of the article peer group.

Elon Musk's SpaceX spent an eye-watering $18.4 billion in its first quarter as a publicly traded company and warned investors to expect similarly high spending in the next two financial quarters, sending the stock price down more than 8% in late trading on Tuesday evening. 
A whopping $15.8 billion of that spending was to power its artificial intelligence efforts, a division that ended the quarter with a $1.3 billion net operating loss. 
The figure comes from the company's first earnings report since the record-setting initial public offering hit the market in mid-June. 
Although the IPO was surely an amazing day for Musk, who briefly became the world's first trillionaire, things have not been all peachy since then, with the stock price currently well below its IPO price. 
As of last week, the company's stock was so far down from its IPO highs that the value it shed was roughly equal to Musk's other company, Tesla's, market capitalization. 
Tuesday's stock sales are unlikely to help that scenario, and neither is the fact that the company's first lockup period ends on Thursday, meaning some company insiders will be able to sell more than $100 billion worth of stock for the first time since SpaceX went public. 
To ease some of those worries, Musk promised dramatic AI advancements. 
“Our rate of growth certainly is faster than anyone else, and our efficiency of compute deployment I think is also the highest,” Musk claimed. 
“So we expect to end this year with over two gigawatts of compute, and probably our cumulative compute online by the end of next year will be several times higher.” 
Those compute plans are ambitious, but Musk struck a defiant tone against any doubters in the earnings call on Tuesday. 
“The terrestrial data centers are a trivial problem compared to making gigantic reusable rockets which are launched frequently,” Musk said. 
Musk said SpaceX's data centers will be exclusively built on Nvidia chips. 
The two companies are also partnering to build Starmind AI satellites, a part of SpaceX's even more ambitious plan to put a giant colony of up to a million AI data centers in Earth's orbit. 
Some experts are hesitant that Musk and his company will be able to pull off the space-based data center colony plan, while many have also raised concerns about the environmental, economic, and social impact of such a huge launch program if it does pan out as promised. 
On the call, Musk said that SpaceX would begin launching the Starmind AI satellites in 2027. 
The company will also be unveiling Grok 5 before the end of the year, which Musk said would be trained on “all the data that SpaceX has ever produced,” making the chatbot “by far the best engineer.” 
Musk has previously claimed the yet-to-be-unveiled LLM will be AGI-level, aka a contested hypothetical AI that would theoretically equal or beat all human capabilities. 
“We expect the cadence of AI development to improve dramatically,” Musk said. 
“I think, by the end of next year, it's not clear to me that there's anything digital at least that AI won't be able to do based on the current rate of improvement.” 
All of this comes with a huge, obvious caveat: Musk has long had a penchant for overpromising. 
His hefty promises extended beyond the AI sphere on Tuesday as well, with the CEO claiming that the company's space business would be launching a rocket a day by next year and that there will be robots working in manufacturing operations on the literal Moon. 
“I know this sounds totally nuts, but you can probably scale to a thousand times the economy of Earth in terms of intelligence launched to space, but probably maybe even a million times,” Musk claimed. 
“We're going to build the factories on the Moon; the robots will be helpful with that. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 3.5%Gizmodo: 3.7%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 1.4%Gizmodo: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 3.3%Gizmodo: 2.9%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 1.0%Gizmodo: 1.3%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.8%Gizmodo: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 35.3%Ece Yildirim: 3.8%Gizmodo: 2.2%Overconfidence Bias35.3%This article: 2.4%Ece Yildirim: 6.9%Gizmodo: 4.8%Framing Effect2.4%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.4%Gizmodo: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.6%Gizmodo: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 10.4%Ece Yildirim: 4.3%Gizmodo: 3.4%Optimism Bias10.4%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 4.8%Gizmodo: 2.1%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 44.6%Ece Yildirim: 9.8%Gizmodo: 7.1%Negativity Bias44.6%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 2.2%Gizmodo: 0.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.8%Gizmodo: 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 2.3%Gizmodo: 0.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.9%Gizmodo: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.9%Gizmodo: 2.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 2.5%Gizmodo: 1.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.2%Gizmodo: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.4%Gizmodo: 1.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.1%Gizmodo: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 6.4%Gizmodo: 3.6%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 3.1%Ece Yildirim: 0.9%Gizmodo: 1.3%False Dilemma3.1%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.9%Gizmodo: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.2%Gizmodo: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 14.1%Ece Yildirim: 6.6%Gizmodo: 4.9%Hasty Generalization14.1%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.2%Gizmodo: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.4%Gizmodo: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 3.0%Gizmodo: 4.3%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 1.6%Gizmodo: 0.8%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 5.2%Gizmodo: 3.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.8%Gizmodo: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.2%Gizmodo: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 1.9%Gizmodo: 1.8%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 1.8%Gizmodo: 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.2%Gizmodo: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.1%Gizmodo: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 2.0%Gizmodo: 3.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.8%Gizmodo: 1.2%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 2.6%Ece Yildirim: 3.8%Gizmodo: 11.9%Biased Writer Voice2.6%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.5%Gizmodo: 1.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.4%Gizmodo: 1.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.7%Gizmodo: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.0%Gizmodo: 2.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or S
0.0%

654 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker26%attributed speech484writer words
Selected voice

Elon Musk

100%flagged-word coverage
170 attributed words100% of attributed speech76% writer coverage
0%2.5%5.0%Biased Writer Voice-3.5 ptsWriter: 3.5%Elon Musk: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading

Loading


Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.