Missouri Supreme Court upholds Trump-backed congressional redistricting plan 4%

By Jason Rosenbaum0%

3/24/2026, 7:49:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 5 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 38 hits. Analysis detected 121 faulty-reasoning hits from 334 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 18.8% and a BS Rank of 4% (16,165 of 16,813 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 96.10% of the article peer group.

The Missouri Supreme Court has upheld the legislature's right to redraw congressional districts in the middle of the decade. 
The court ruled 4-3 that a new map drawn in 2025 is valid, because there's nothing in the Missouri Constitution explicitly prohibiting lawmakers from doing it. 
"The crux of Appellants' argument is that, because [the Missouri Constitution] identifies a specific time when the General Assembly shall legislate new congressional districts, the General Assembly cannot redistrict at any other time," wrote Judge Zel Fischer in the majority opinion. 
"Appellants are incorrect." 
Fischer was joined by Judge Ginger Gooch, Brent Powell and Kelly Broniec. 
Judges Paul Wilson, Robin Ransom and Mary Russell dissented. 
"The plain language of [the Missouri Constitution] unmistakably states 'when' and 'how' the general assembly may  indeed, must  draw new congressional districts," Wilson wrote in his dissent. 
"When the constitution instructs the general assembly 'when' and 'how' a power is to be exercised, there is a 'strong presumption that it was designed to be exercised in that time and mode only.' 
This should end the analysis." 
The upshot of the Supreme Court's decision is that a map that seeks to oust Democratic Rep. 
Emanuel Cleaver of Kansas City may end up being in effect for the 2026 election. 
But Chuck Hatfield, who represented the plaintiffs in the case, noted that it's not the end of the legal battle over the map. 
Among other things, a Cole County judge is still deciding whether a group's submission of referendum signatures for a vote prevented the 2025 map from going into effect. 
If judges ultimately say that a map passed in 2022 will be active for this election cycle, it effectively guarantees Cleaver will win since that version of the 5th District is heavily Democratic. 
"This was a battle in a bigger war," Hatfield said. 
"It was a major battle. 
But I was saying that two weeks ago." 
This is a developing story that will be updated 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
11.4%
Framing Effect
7.5%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
9.9%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
0%
Self-Serving Bias
2.4%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
5.1%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

334 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.