Lawmakers fight worker discipline change at Portsmouth Naval Shipyard ⁠44%

By Ian Lenahan - Portsmouth Herald⁠50%

8/8/2026, 7:10:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 15 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Loss Aversion, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 24.7% saturation with 48 hits. Analysis detected 435 faulty-reasoning hits from 194 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 39.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (17,173 of 30,584 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 56.10% of the article peer group.

This story was originally produced by the Portsmouth Herald. 
NHPR is republishing it in partnership with the Granite State News Collaborative. 
Congressional delegation members from Maine and New Hampshire are fighting proposed federal disciplinary review changes they contend would hurt Portsmouth Naval Shipyard workers. 
The U.S. 
Office of Personnel Management and the Merit Systems Protection Board pitched a new “Promoting Employee Accountability" policy in early July aimed at altering existing standards used by federal supervisors to discipline workers. 
Lawmakers say the policy, in reality, would strip away merit-based employment and due process for workers. 
Six lawmakers — Sens. 
Jeanne Shaheen, D-NH, Maggie Hassan, D-NH, and Angus King, I-Maine, and Reps. 
Chris Pappas, D-NH, Maggie Goodlander, D-NH, and Chellie Pingree, D-Maine — shared their criticism of the proposal with the two agencies. 
A Monday, Aug. 3 letter from the group to Scott Kupor, the OPM’s director, and Henry Kerner, acting chairperson of the MSPB, argued the proposal could strain the shipyard’s existing workforce, noting the 226-year-old installation already needs to hire more than 700 workers annually to meet demand. 
Read more of this story at Seacoastonline. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 8.2%Ian Lenahan - Portsmouth Herald: 1.2%New Hampshire Public Radio: 1.9%Confirmation Bias8.2%This article: 0.0%Ian Lenahan - Portsmouth Herald: 5.1%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 24.2%Ian Lenahan - Portsmouth Herald: 9.1%New Hampshire Public Radio: 2.5%Availability Heuristic24.2%This article: 0.0%Ian Lenahan - Portsmouth Herald: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.6%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Lenahan - Portsmouth Herald: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Lenahan - Portsmouth Herald: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.7%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 4.6%Ian Lenahan - Portsmouth Herald: 8.2%New Hampshire Public Radio: 3.8%Framing Effect4.6%This article: 24.2%Ian Lenahan - Portsmouth Herald: 3.5%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.8%Loss Aversion24.2%This article: 0.0%Ian Lenahan - Portsmouth Herald: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 1.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Lenahan - Portsmouth Herald: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 16.5%Ian Lenahan - Portsmouth Herald: 4.4%New Hampshire Public Radio: 1.7%Optimism Bias16.5%This article: 11.9%Ian Lenahan - Portsmouth Herald: 1.7%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.6%Pessimism Bias11.9%This article: 12.9%Ian Lenahan - Portsmouth Herald: 3.6%New Hampshire Public Radio: 3.8%Negativity Bias12.9%This article: 0.0%Ian Lenahan - Portsmouth Herald: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 1.5%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Lenahan - Portsmouth Herald: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.3%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Lenahan - Portsmouth Herald: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Lenahan - Portsmouth Herald: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 1.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Lenahan - Portsmouth Herald: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Lenahan - Portsmouth Herald: 1.7%New Hampshire Public Radio: 1.2%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Lenahan - Portsmouth Herald: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Lenahan - Portsmouth Herald: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Lenahan - Portsmouth Herald: 2.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.8%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Lenahan - Portsmouth Herald: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.1%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Lenahan - Portsmouth Herald: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Lenahan - Portsmouth Herald: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Lenahan - Portsmouth Herald: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 16.5%Ian Lenahan - Portsmouth Herald: 4.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 1.9%Appeal to Authority16.5%This article: 0.0%Ian Lenahan - Portsmouth Herald: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 1.0%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 8.2%Ian Lenahan - Portsmouth Herald: 2.4%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.2%Slippery Slope8.2%This article: 0.0%Ian Lenahan - Portsmouth Herald: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 24.2%Ian Lenahan - Portsmouth Herald: 9.1%New Hampshire Public Radio: 2.6%Hasty Generalization24.2%This article: 0.0%Ian Lenahan - Portsmouth Herald: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Lenahan - Portsmouth Herald: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 11.9%Ian Lenahan - Portsmouth Herald: 8.2%New Hampshire Public Radio: 2.7%Appeal to Emotion11.9%This article: 8.2%Ian Lenahan - Portsmouth Herald: 2.4%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.7%Begging the Question8.2%This article: 0.0%Ian Lenahan - Portsmouth Herald: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Lenahan - Portsmouth Herald: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Lenahan - Portsmouth Herald: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.2%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Lenahan - Portsmouth Herald: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Lenahan - Portsmouth Herald: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Lenahan - Portsmouth Herald: 1.7%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.9%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Lenahan - Portsmouth Herald: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Lenahan - Portsmouth Herald: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Lenahan - Portsmouth Herald: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Lenahan - Portsmouth Herald: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Lenahan - Portsmouth Herald: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Lenahan - Portsmouth Herald: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Lenahan - Portsmouth Herald: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 24.2%Ian Lenahan - Portsmouth Herald: 3.5%New Hampshire Public Radio: 1.3%Unattributed Quote24.2%This article: 0.0%Ian Lenahan - Portsmouth Herald: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.3%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 24.7%Ian Lenahan - Portsmouth Herald: 4.7%New Hampshire Public Radio: 1.2%Biased Writer Voice24.7%This article: 0.0%Ian Lenahan - Portsmouth Herald: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 1.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Lenahan - Portsmouth Herald: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Lenahan - Portsmouth Herald: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.6%Ian Lenahan - Portsmouth Herald: 1.1%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…3.6%

194 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers34%attributed speech129writer words
100%flagged-word coverage
32 attributed words49% of attributed speech79% writer coverage
0%20.0%40.0%Biased Writer Voice-37.2 ptsWriter: 37.2%Office of Personnel Management: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-36.4 ptsWriter: 36.4%Office of Personnel Management: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -5.4 ptsWriter: 5.4%Office of Personnel Management: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.