Gothamist76%

Early Addition: A New Jersey affordable housing bureaucrat is rocking on 'Jeopardy!' 0%

By James Ramsay0%

4/14/2026, 2:01:05 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 16 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Unattributed Quote, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 40.9% saturation with 72 hits. Analysis detected 434 faulty-reasoning hits from 176 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,813 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the article peer group.

Good Tuesday morning in New York City, where it could soon be legal to hang a little solar panel out your apartment window. 
Here's what else is happening: 
 Republican Rep. 
Mike Lawler, who represents a Hudson Valley swing district, took (and returned) some harsh words at a recent town hall. 
 Since Mayor Mamdani took office, the financial service industry's New York City employment numbers have hit a record high. 
 Meet the orange cat who survived getting hit by a Long Island Rail Road train. 
 The New Jersey affordable housing tax credit administrator who's been rocking on "Jeopardy!" 
used one of his little chat segments to scold New York for not building enough units. 
 "Bees are sold by weight, like cheese or cocaine": Welcome to the Upper West Side's annual live bee hive sale. 
 Keegan Michael-Key is in every commercial. 
 It's a little disappointing to see people dry-snitching on their favorite expensive chicken restaurants. 
 And finally, shoo: 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
13.1%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
11.4%
Overconfidence Bias
4%
Framing Effect
0%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
13.1%
Pessimism Bias
8.5%
Negativity Bias
40.9%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
9.1%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
8%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
4%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
20.5%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
11.4%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
11.9%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
23.3%
Quote-first Misdirection
19.9%
Biased Writer Voice
38.6%
Indoctrination
9.1%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

176 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.