Rare blue lobster gets another shot at life in the ocean 12%

By Sara Hashemi33%

8/6/2026, 11:43:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 15 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 55 hits. Analysis detected 327 faulty-reasoning hits from 477 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 21.5% and a BS Rank of 12% (26,571 of 30,100 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 88.30% of the article peer group.

A small natural history museum in New Hampshire has a colorful new visitor: a blue lobster . 
This unique creature certainly had a long journey to its current home. 
He was captured by commercial fishermen in New Bedford, Massachusetts, sent up to Maine, and then down to New Hampshire. 
The crustacean was then donated to Explore the Ocean World , a hands-on museum in Hampton Beach. 
Ellen Goethel , Explore the Ocean World’s owner and curator tells Popular Science he is currently acclimating in his new tank. 
“He’s a beautiful lobster,” she says. 
Researchers estimate that blue lobsters like this one are about 1 in 2 million. 
This unique crustacean will spend the summer at Explore the Ocean World in New Hampshire. 
Image: Ellen Goethel/ Explore the Ocean World. 
Why are some lobsters so colorful? 
American lobsters ( Homarus americanus ) are usually a greenish-brown color, to help them blend in with the rocky seafloor. 
They get their color from a red-orange pigment called astaxanthin. 
When astaxanthin binds to proteins in the shell—including a blue-colored protein called crustacyanin—its color shifts, producing a lobster’s familiar hue. 
But some lobsters end up more colorful. 
Rare genetic mutations can alter the amount of crustacyanin or how it interacts with astaxanthin, producing a striking blue shell. 
Other colors include half-orange half-black , cotton candy , or even calico patterns . 
A lobster’s diet can also impact its shell color. 
For example, individuals that only eat small fish rather than shrimp and crabs get less astaxanthin, which can affect their coloration. 
The chance of finding a blue lobster like this one is about 1 in 2 million. 
As for the other colors, the chance of finding a red lobster is 1 in 10 million, split-colored is 1 in 50 million, and albino is and cotton candy are 1 in 100 million. 
This particular lobster was caught near New Bedford, Massachusetts. 
Image: Ellen Goethel/ Explore the Ocean World. 
Winning the lobster lottery 
Come Labor Day, this particular blue lobster will once again be on the move. 
Goethel says the museum will shut down its tanks, and return all of its animals to the ocean. 
Before they’re released, each of the museum’s multicolored lobsters will be fitted with a tag so that the New Hampshire Fish and Game Department can monitor it. 
This way, if one turns up in a fisher’s trap, the fisher can call the department and report where it was caught, so researchers can track its migration patterns. 
Then, the lobster can be set free once more. 
“They kind of won the lottery,” says Goethel. 
“All of the lobsters that we have have a little extra safety measured into their lives.” 
The post Rare blue lobster gets another shot at life in the ocean appeared first on Popular Science . 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Sara Hashemi: 1.3%Popular Science: 1.8%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sara Hashemi: 0.2%Popular Science: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 8.6%Sara Hashemi: 3.2%Popular Science: 2.4%Availability Heuristic8.6%This article: 4.2%Sara Hashemi: 1.5%Popular Science: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic4.2%This article: 0.0%Sara Hashemi: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 11.5%Sara Hashemi: 4.8%Popular Science: 2.4%Overconfidence Bias11.5%This article: 4.0%Sara Hashemi: 2.3%Popular Science: 3.0%Framing Effect4.0%This article: 0.0%Sara Hashemi: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 3.4%Sara Hashemi: 0.5%Popular Science: 0.6%Status Quo Bias3.4%This article: 0.0%Sara Hashemi: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 4.8%Sara Hashemi: 9.9%Popular Science: 3.9%Optimism Bias4.8%This article: 0.0%Sara Hashemi: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.6%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sara Hashemi: 1.1%Popular Science: 2.7%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 3.4%Sara Hashemi: 0.6%Popular Science: 0.5%Self-Serving Bias3.4%This article: 0.0%Sara Hashemi: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.3%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Sara Hashemi: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sara Hashemi: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.3%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sara Hashemi: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sara Hashemi: 1.0%Popular Science: 1.6%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sara Hashemi: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sara Hashemi: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sara Hashemi: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.8%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 3.6%Sara Hashemi: 0.6%Popular Science: 0.3%Primacy Effect3.6%This article: 0.0%Sara Hashemi: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sara Hashemi: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Sara Hashemi: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 2.1%Sara Hashemi: 5.2%Popular Science: 3.4%Appeal to Authority2.1%This article: 0.0%Sara Hashemi: 0.6%Popular Science: 0.6%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Sara Hashemi: 0.2%Popular Science: 0.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Sara Hashemi: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 4.4%Sara Hashemi: 2.2%Popular Science: 3.3%Hasty Generalization4.4%This article: 0.0%Sara Hashemi: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Sara Hashemi: 0.6%Popular Science: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 4.6%Sara Hashemi: 2.8%Popular Science: 2.6%Appeal to Emotion4.6%This article: 0.0%Sara Hashemi: 0.2%Popular Science: 0.4%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Sara Hashemi: 1.6%Popular Science: 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Sara Hashemi: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Sara Hashemi: 0.3%Popular Science: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Sara Hashemi: 0.5%Popular Science: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Sara Hashemi: 0.7%Popular Science: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 2.5%Sara Hashemi: 0.1%Popular Science: 1.7%Anecdotal2.5%This article: 0.0%Sara Hashemi: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.9%Sara Hashemi: 1.7%Popular Science: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.9%This article: 0.0%Sara Hashemi: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Sara Hashemi: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Sara Hashemi: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Sara Hashemi: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 4.2%Sara Hashemi: 0.2%Popular Science: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy4.2%This article: 0.0%Sara Hashemi: 0.6%Popular Science: 1.4%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Sara Hashemi: 1.2%Popular Science: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Sara Hashemi: 1.8%Popular Science: 3.7%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Sara Hashemi: 0.2%Popular Science: 1.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Sara Hashemi: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sara Hashemi: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 4.4%Sara Hashemi: 0.5%Popular Science: 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…4.4%

477 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker14%attributed speech408writer words
Selected voice

Ellen Goethel

74%flagged-word coverage
69 attributed words100% of attributed speech55% writer coverage
0%17.5%35.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +30.4 ptsWriter: 0.0%Ellen Goethel: 30.4%30.4%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.