The Verge71%

Spider-Man: Brand New Day leak racks up millions of views 45%

By Terrence O'Brien72%

8/1/2026, 10:00:12 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 18 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Anchoring Bias as the most egregious example at 27.6% saturation with 56 hits. Analysis detected 426 faulty-reasoning hits from 203 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 42.2% and a BS Rank of 45% (14,123 of 25,467 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 55.50% of the article peer group.

A bootleg of Spider-Man: Brand New Day was up on X for over seven hours before eventually being pulled. 
During that time, it reached over 5.9 million accounts and accumulated over 143,000 likes. 
Other accounts have reposted the leaked film, but none have lasted particularly long, as Disney now seems to be on top of issuing takedown requests. 
The leak is unlikely to slow down the box office juggernaut, which is already shattering records. 
It raked in $72 million in previews this week. 
The previous record holder was Avengers: Endgame, which grossed $60 million during its previews way back in 2019. 
Endgame went on to set staggering records for opening weekend, grossing over $1.2 billion worldwide and over $350 million in the US. 
Spider-Man: No Way Home currently holds the number two spot on the all-time US opening weekend list with $260 million. 
Brand New Day could potentially usurp Endgame, though it certainly faces an uphill battle. 
Between previews and opening day, it’s already grossed $168 million, which puts it ahead of Endgame’s $157.4 million. 
Sony is keeping its estimates somewhat conservative, saying it expects the latest Spider-Man to pull in $325 million. 
Confirmation Bias
21.2%
Anchoring Bias
27.6%
Availability Heuristic
11.8%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
8.9%
Framing Effect
4.4%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
8.9%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
7.9%
Pessimism Bias
6.9%
Negativity Bias
26.6%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
10.8%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
10.8%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
8.9%
False Dilemma
6.9%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
7.9%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
12.3%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
6.9%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
8.9%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
12.3%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

203 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.