grist.org29%
‘Why take those jobs away?’: The unionized workers decrying Trump’s war on wind 29%
By Michael Sainato0% The Guardian0%
7/12/2026, 1:00:00 PM
BS Summary: This article contains 18 faulty reasoning types, including Fundamental Attribution Error, Loss Aversion, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 119 hits. Analysis detected 785 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,177 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 39.6% and a BS Rank of 29% (10,760 of 15,051 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 71.50% of the article peer group.
Donald Trump has blamed everything — from “national security” issues, the deaths of birds and whales , and cancer — in his decades-long campaign against windfarms.
But as the Trump administration continues to undermine the industry, what worries workers most is their jobs.
Since taking office for a second term, Trump has issued an executive order aiming to halt all wind-energy leases and permits, attempted to issue stop-work orders on wind projects under construction, and paid more than $2.6 billion in settlements to buy out wind energy leases.
And hundreds of workers have been affected.
Thomas Kilday, a furnace electrician with IBEW Local 99 in Providence, Rhode Island, was in the midst of a four-week shift onboard a vessel off the Atlantic coast working on the Revolution Wind Project in August last year when the Trump administration issued a stop-work order on the project.
“No one really knew what was going on.
We didn’t know what it meant for us.
We just knew that everything was up in the air,” said Kilday.
“You plan your whole life around being gone for 28 days, and to come out here and have it thrown up in the air, worrying what does this mean for me, for my pay for the next four weeks, what’s going to happen?
There’s a lot of uncertainty.”
Read Next
American farmers bet on solar.
Then Trump changed the rules.
Ayurella Horn-Muller , Melina Walling , Clayton Aldern , & M.K.
Wildeman
Construction on the project is done on shifts of 28 days on and 28 days off, with workers residing on a vessel on the ocean and taking helicopters to work on the turbines.
A federal court granted an injunction to block the stop-work order in September last year.
In December, the Trump administration issued another 90-day stop-work order , citing national security, before a second judge issued an injunction in January.
When the second stop-work order was issued, Kilday was celebrating Christmas with his family and preparing for another four-week shift.
“That was really difficult,” he said.
“I just spent a bunch of money on Christmas gifts for my family, and it was not what I wanted to be thinking about.
Six months out of the year, we’re away from home, and for what little time we do have at home, not to be able to just focus all of that time and energy on our families, it’s tough.
It’s not a great feeling to be worried about your job when you’re supposed to be home.”
“We’re proud of the work that we do out here, and we want to be able to continue to do it.
We think it’s important work,” added Kilday.
“When I’m at home, and I drive down my street, I look up at those power lines.
I helped create the power that’s running through those power lines, and I’m proud of that.”
Read Next
There’s hope for the offshore wind industry — yes, really
Jake Bittle
Revolution Wind announced in March that it began delivering power to New England, citing the work of more than 1,000 local union workers, and is expected to power more than 350,000 homes and businesses.
The project’s construction is over 90 percent complete .
In June, the Trump administration abandoned an effort to try to halt all wind projects and leases across the U.S., giving up a challenge in court to a judge tossing Trump’s executive order to freeze all permitting and leasing for wind projects.
Instead, the Trump administration has opted to buy out wind project leases.
Trump’s Department of Interior has completed four deals so far to cancel wind project leases, paying energy corporations a sum of more than $2.6 billion , including paying $765 million to Invenergy to abandon four wind projects in California, New York, and Maine and nearly $900 million to Bluepoint Wind and Garden State Wind to cancel offshore wind leases in New York and California.
“I think it’s a foolish policy that the Trump administration is engaging in trying to buy out these leases,” Pat Crowley, president of the Rhode Island AFL-CIO, told The Guardian.
“These projects are not only helping to reduce our carbon emissions, they’re providing good-paying union jobs for thousands.”
Crowley said that workers would have had long-term job stability from working on these projects.
He noted the Trump administration had lost in court in its attempts to issue stop-work orders on five wind projects in the Rhode Island area.
Read Next
Texas saw a $50B future in clean energy.
Then the political winds shifted.
Laura Mallonee
“We’re five for five taking on the Trump administration,” he said.
“What the Trump administration is doing is just throwing money away for the sake of their ideology.”
Will Gonzalez, a construction laborer with the Laborers’ Local 385 in Fairhaven, Massachusetts, worked on the Vineyard Wind 1 project off the coast of Martha’s Vineyard, a project the Trump administration attempted to halt in January.
The project is now completed and fully operational.
He criticized the Trump administration’s efforts to halt wind turbine projects, claiming the opposition from Trump stems from his experiences trying to stop a wind turbine project near his golf course in Scotland, losing an appeal in December 2015.
“It’s a personal vendetta,” said Gonzalez.
“Good union jobs – we shouldn’t be trying to take those off the table.
That just doesn’t make any kind of sense.
Families obviously need good jobs … why take those jobs away?”
Gonzalez said he and his co-workers were leaving training and certifications unused because of the halting of wind power projects.
“All of us that worked on that Vineyard Wind 1, obviously, we would have loved to segue right into another project,” he said.
“We’re fully trained, ready to go, willing and able, so it directly affected us.
But you move on.
You [have] got to move on.
You can’t sit and dwell on that, because that’s not going to pay the bills.”
The White House directed comment to the Department of Interior.
A spokesperson for the department denied the cancellation and stop-work orders of projects had had any impact on jobs, even on projects under construction when halted.
The spokesperson did not respond to a question asking for clarification and did not comment on Trump’s prior animus toward wind turbine projects involving his golf courses.
“No jobs were eliminated because none of these leases were operational or supporting employment,” the spokesperson said.
“Rather than waiting years for the projects to materialize, the Trump administration is prioritizing investments in existing infrastructure and functioning supply chains that can create jobs now and deliver economic benefits faster.
“This approach puts more people to work more quickly, using proven, affordable, and reliable energy rather than relying on projects tied to leases that were not producing jobs in the first place.”
This story was originally published by Grist with the headline ‘Why take those jobs away?’: The unionized workers decrying Trump’s war on wind on Jul 12, 2026.
Speakers
3speakers34%attributed speech778writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Selected voice
100%flagged-word coveragePat Crowley
76 attributed words19% of attributed speech47% writer coverage
Biased Writer Voice-5.7 pts
Writer 5.7%Pat Crowley 0%
Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.
Analysis
Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.