ZeroHedge61%

United States Retains Spot As World's Top Oil Producer 35%

By Tyler Durden67%

7/13/2026, 1:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 14 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Ad Hominem, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 68 hits. Analysis detected 492 faulty-reasoning hits from 830 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 43% and a BS Rank of 35% (9,717 of 14,828 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 65.50% of the article peer group.

Authored by Naveen Athrappully via The Epoch Times, 
The United States was the largest crude oil producer in the world in 2025, outputting a “record-high” 13.6 million barrels per day (bpd), according to a July 9 statement from the Energy Information Administration (EIA). 
America’s output was far ahead of second-placed Russia, which produced 9.9 million bpd. 
Saudi Arabia came in third with 9.6 million bpd, with Canada in the fourth spot at 5 million bpd. 
The difference in oil output between the United States and other top producers widened last year, with Russian supplies mostly remaining unchanged year-over-year while Saudi Arabia saw a modest increase. 
The 13.6 million bpd output breaks the previous U.S. and global production record of 13.2 million bpd set in 2024. 
The United States first overtook Russia as the top global oil producer in 2018 and has since retained the number one spot. 
EIA attributed the consistently high oil production in the United States to “continued gains in drilling productivity and operational efficiency across key shale basins, which allow operators to extract more oil per well.” 
Powered by shale development, the United States has become not only the top crude oil producer “but the largest producer of crude oil ever,” the agency said. 
In addition to record-high production last year, exports have been climbing. 
In April, U.S. exports of crude oil and petroleum products hit a record, with crude oil exports averaging 5.6 million bpd, 21 percent higher than the previous record from December 2023, the EIA said in a July 8 statement. 
The exports of finished petroleum products, including jet fuel and motor gasoline, hit the highest level since December 2024. 
The record-high exports in April 2026 came amid disruptions to energy shipments through the Strait of Hormuz due to the U.S.–Iran war, a development that ended up boosting global demand for American energy. 
Brent crude oil futures had hit a peak of over $126 per barrel in April. 
Prices have since come down and ended Friday at around $76. 
In its latest statement, EIA said the jump in oil production last year happened despite oil prices being lower, with the West Texas Intermediate (WTI) price dropping from an average of $77 per barrel in 2024 to $65 per barrel in 2025. 
WTI is a benchmark for crude oil produced in the United States. 
Moreover, EIA predicts America’s crude oil production to be close to 13.7 million bpd this year and to rise to 14.2 million bpd in 2027. 
Boosting Oil Production 
The higher oil output follows multiple actions taken by the Trump administration aimed at boosting production. 
In November 2025, the administration announced the approval of new oil drilling leases off the coasts of Alaska, Florida, and California. 
In January this year, the administration initiated the first step to offering oil and gas drilling leases in California, with the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management seeking information on potential lease areas to auction as early as next year. 
In March, the Department of the Interior conducted an oil lease sale in the National Petroleum Reserve–Alaska, the first since 2019. 
This action came under criticism from the environmental group Sierra Club. 
Mike Scott, Sierra Club’s oil and gas campaign manager, in a March 18 statement, accused President Donald Trump of making oil corporation CEOs richer at the cost of the environment. 
“The Western Arctic is not just any landscape—it’s one of the last true wild places in the country, home to rare and threatened wildlife and cultures that have subsisted on the land for thousands of years,” Scott said. 
“Drilling in the Arctic won’t solve our energy crisis, but it will cause irreversible damage to these pristine landscapes. 
Big Oil has been champing at the bit to get its hands on these lands, and Trump is making their wishes come true.” 
Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum had said, post the lease sale in Alaska, that the sale underscored the reserve’s vital role in strengthening America’s energy security. 
The reserve “was created to support our nation’s energy needs, and this successful sale demonstrates what’s possible when we align responsible development with that original purpose,” Burgum said. 
“Revenues from these leases will help bolster local communities, create good‑paying jobs, and ensure that Alaska continues to be a cornerstone of America’s domestic energy production.” 
Meanwhile, the U.S. 
Department of Justice has decided to ditch the oil and gas leasing restrictions imposed by the prior administration in the Coastal Plain of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. 
Alaska and its industrial development and export authority had filed lawsuits challenging the restrictions. 
On July 7, the department said that these restrictions violated federal law and asked the court to dismiss the lawsuits. 
U.S. acting Attorney General Todd Blanche said that the prior administration’s actions “improperly limited” Alaska’s energy potential through “unreasonable” regulations. 
“This settlement supports the Trump administration’s commitment to secure American energy independence and our national security for generations to come.” 
Confirmation Bias
3.6%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
3%
Framing Effect
4.9%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
8.2%
Pessimism Bias
2.3%
Negativity Bias
0%
Self-Serving Bias
2.4%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
2.8%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
6.4%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
3.4%
False Dilemma
2.3%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
7%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
5.9%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
2.8%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
4.3%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

830 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers38%attributed speech514writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Selected voice

Mike Scott

100%flagged-word coverage
110 attributed words35% of attributed speech32% writer coverage
Politically Left Leaning Bias+20.9 pts
Writer 0%Mike Scott 21%
Politically Right Leaning Bias-3.1 pts
Writer 3.1%Mike Scott 0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.