STLPR0%

As Canvas hack disrupts schools across Missouri, experts worry about copycat attacks 77%

By Chad Davis0%

5/8/2026, 10:23:20 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Overconfidence Bias, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.6% saturation with 71 hits. Analysis detected 816 faulty-reasoning hits from 428 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 68.9% and a BS Rank of 77% (4,024 of 16,813 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 76.10% of the article peer group.

Access to an online portal used by universities across the country, including schools in Missouri, has been restored following a cyberattack. 
Instructure, the parent company behind course management portal Canvas, announced the hack Thursday. 
The portal provides course materials and notes used by students, teachers and professors. 
More than 8,000 schools use the portal. 
Instructure developers said Thursday evening that most of its services were back online. 
ShinnyHunters, the computer hacker network, published a ransom note claiming to have stolen data from its users and threatening to publish it by May 12. 
“I don't know whether it will happen or not, but also [whether] there is any negotiation, we don't know yet,” University of Missouri Science and Technology professor Sejun Song said. 
The group, which is primarily made up of teenagers and young adults from the US and the United Kingdom, also made headlines for hacking Ticketmaster in 2024. 
Song said the hackers exploited vulnerabilities within the Canvas portal through the company's Free-for-Teacher accounts. 
The University of Missouri-St. 
Louis said Friday morning that the software is back online, though some functions that interact with Canvas are still unavailable. 
The university said it will monitor updates and assess any potential impact on operations. 
A spokesperson for St. 
Louis University said it also will continue to monitor the situation. 
“The university communicated with students, faculty and staff during the disruption and focused on supporting teaching and learning as access was restored,” a spokesperson for SLU said. 
Song said the ransomware attack differs from other attacks because the hacker group did not encrypt its files; instead, it stole a large amount of data and threatened to publish it unless an agreement is reached. 
The breach came during an inopportune time when most universities are in the middle of final exams. 
Song said he's also worried about potential copycat and sequel attacks. 
ShinnyHunters claims to have stolen the records of almost 300 million users. 
Instructure said there's no evidence that financial data, passwords or Social Security numbers were compromised. 
Song suggested stronger security measures are needed to prevent future attacks, including utilizing Zero Trust Architecture, which requires authentication for everyone in the same network. 
He also recommends stronger API tools, which build and maintain connections between programs. 
Song said he's paying attention to future attacks that involve artificial intelligence. 
“What I'm really worrying about is the possibility of marrying with AI tools and then future exploitation,” Song said. 
“Those things will break all the systems; those things are really worrisome.” 
Confirmation Bias
6.3%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
4.4%
Representativeness Heuristic
14.3%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
15.9%
Framing Effect
2.8%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
5.8%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
16.1%
Pessimism Bias
9.8%
Negativity Bias
16.6%
Self-Serving Bias
6.3%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
6.3%
Halo Effect
6.3%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
6.3%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
9.3%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
7.2%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
5.6%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
9.3%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
4%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
1.9%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
5.8%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
7%
Quote-first Misdirection
11.4%
Biased Writer Voice
2.8%
Indoctrination
8.9%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

428 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.