Trump is an Angry, Violent Man … And Canada is His Battered Wife 51%
By Josh Marshall65%
7/21/2026, 10:21:24 PM
Keywords: Editors Blog, The Backchannel
BS Summary: This article contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 26.9% saturation with 63 hits. Analysis detected 553 faulty-reasoning hits from 234 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 51.4% and a BS Rank of 51% (9,556 of 19,502 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 51.00% of the article peer group.
Donald Trump has announced that he will impose in 30 days a new round of tariffs on Canada.
Those tariffs are at best of dubious legality.
They are justified under the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930, which has quite likely been superseded by subsequent post-war trade legislation.
But questions of legality, while critical, tend to obscure the more elemental question of, why?
There are at least arguments as to why the US might want to impose protectionist measures against China or other countries with far lower wages and workforce protections.
There are other weaker but still arguable rationales for protectionism targeting Europe.
One can even make arguments about Mexico since wages south of the border are still much lower than in the US.
(To be clear, I mostly don’t agree with these arguments, though I also disagree with a doctrinaire free trade approach.)
There’s really no economic or strategic argument for these tariffs on Canadian goods at all.
Canada has comparable living standards and regulatory regimes to the US; key US industries like autos are woven across the US border.
The anchor of US prosperity has always been the way it amounts to a massive free trade zone.
And Canada only extends that to the north.
And yet tariffs against Canada appear to be the White House’s near or entire focus.
Analysis
Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.