BS Summary: This article contains 8 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Optimism Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 38.8% saturation with 81 hits. Analysis detected 305 faulty-reasoning hits from 209 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 25.1% and a BS Rank of 9% (20,096 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 91.80% of the article peer group.

Nara Organics recalled its organic baby formula sold nationwide in Target stores and online Saturday after a multistate outbreak of infant botulism, federal authorities said. 
Three babies between 2 and 5 months became ill in April and May in California, Pennsylvania and Washington after consuming Nara Organics Whole Milk Organic Powdered infant formula, which is also sold on Nara.com, the U.S. 
Food and Drug Administration said. 
They were hospitalized and treated with the FDA-approved treatment for infant botulism, the agency said. 
Infant botulism is a rare but serious illness that occurs in babies under age 1, whose gut microbiomes are immature. 
It is caused when infants consume bacteria with spores that produce a toxin in the gut. 
Symptoms include constipation, poor feeding, drooping eyelids, weak muscle tone, difficulty swallowing and breathing problems, among others. 
Babies who develop those symptoms need immediate medical attention. 
The sole treatment is BabyBIG, an IV medication made from blood plasma of people immunized against botulism. 
Nara Organics Whole Milk Organic Infant Formula makes up less than 1% of all infant formula sold in the United States, and the outbreak does not create shortage concerns for parents and caregivers, the FDA said. 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
8.1%
Framing Effect
0%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
17.2%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
4.3%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
38.8%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
17.2%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
38.8%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
17.2%
Indoctrination
4.3%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

209 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.