A rare 3-D snake fossil is spilling secrets of its unusual lifestyle 8%

By Libby Riddle33%

7/22/2026, 8:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 11 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic, Post Hoc (False Cause), and False Dilemma, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 40 hits. Analysis detected 244 faulty-reasoning hits from 532 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 19.4% and a BS Rank of 8% (23,839 of 25,715 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 92.70% of the article peer group.

Most snake fossils are two-dimensional. 
Sandwiched within rocks, the pressure of millions of years flattens them like a pancake. 
But in 2020, scientists uncovered a uniquely well-preserved snake fossil in southeastern Brazil. 
The snake’s tiny skull  only 20 millimeters in length  was 3-D, with its braincase still intact. 
The fossil’s well-preserved skull has now provided the earliest concrete evidence of a fossorial snake  a serpent that burrowed underground. 
And that suggests early snakes explored more habitats and lifestyles than previously thought, researchers report July 22 in Nature. 
The fossil belongs to a previously unknown snake species that lived 85 million to 75 million years ago. 
Researchers named it Tametara mirim, after the words for “adorned” and “small-sized” in the Tupí-Guaraní language of Brazil. 
It is one of only four snake fossils from the Age of Dinosaurs preserved this well. 
“This quality of preservation allows us to answer questions you simply cannot answer if you don’t have the right body parts preserved,” says paleobiologist Tiago Simões of Princeton University. 
The skull and braincase (inset) of a newfound ancient snake species were still intact. 
That rare find allowed scientists to reconstruct what the snake’s brain would have looked like, details that provided clues to its behavior. 
Unlike human brains, which float in fluid within our skulls, the shape of snake brains closely matches the inside of their braincase. 
Using CT scans, the researchers reconstructed T. mirim’s brain anatomy. 
Well-developed brain regions correspond to the senses the snake relied on most. 
T. mirim had a poorly developed optic lobe, so it probably couldn’t see very well. 
But its otic capsule, a bony structure that protects the inner ear, was enlarged  a feature often seen in snakes that sense vibrations. 
It also had an unusually thick skull. 
These features suggest T. mirim lived underground, digging tunnels by butting its head against the dirt. 
The environment where snakes first originated remains a mystery. 
But the earliest known snake ancestor  which lived 167 million years ago  may have been somewhat adapted for an underground lifestyle, though was not nearly as good at burrowing as T. mirim, Simões says. 
By the Cretaceous Period, snakes were swimming, slithering and, in T. mirim’s case, digging. 
Simões says the apparent increase in diversity in the Cretaceous could be because snakes evolved new sensory functions and abilities very quickly or because they were diverse all along. 
Finding new fossils with intact braincases could help resolve that debate. 
What is clear is that early snake evolution was much more complex than previously thought, says paleontologist Michael Caldwell of the University of Alberta in Edmonton, Canada, who was not involved in the research. 
The snake family tree probably included many branching lineages with their own unique anatomies and lifestyles. 
To better understand how snakes diversified into all their modern forms, scientists will need to find fossils that show the transitions between different lifestyles. 
“When organisms become highly specialized for a particular environment, they don’t become so in the blink of an eye,” Simões says. 
“What we have today are the endpoints of a very long evolutionary history.” 
Confirmation Bias
4.1%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
7.5%
Representativeness Heuristic
6.8%
Hindsight Bias
2.6%
Overconfidence Bias
3%
Framing Effect
0%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
3.6%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
0%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
2.3%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
5.5%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
5.6%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
2.1%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
2.8%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

532 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.