Engadget44%

MLB bans using dugout iPads for AI-powered in-game strategy calls 78%

By Anna Washenko60%

7/16/2026, 8:26:13 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Slippery Slope, and Biased Writer Voice, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 43% saturation with 148 hits. Analysis detected 1,112 faulty-reasoning hits from 344 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 70.3% and a BS Rank of 78% (3,852 of 17,019 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 77.40% of the article peer group.

It appears the urge to turn all critical thinking over to AI has not escaped Major League Baseball teams. 
Regular baseball viewers have become accustomed to seeing players and staff huddled around tablets in the dugout. 
The expectation is that the devices are used for reviewing performance and maybe crunching last-minute stats, but apparently MLB officials have intervened to prevent teams from using the hardware for running generative AI. 
League officials have taken the unusual step of making a mid-season policy change to crack down on the use of custom apps that would take over "recommendations regarding substitutions, pitch calling, and other in-game decisions traditionally made by players and coaches." 
*The Athletic* reported that the news was delivered via a memo from the commissioner's office on June 11. 
Sources told the publication as many as a third of teams were using tablets for these unintended purposes, although no clubs will be facing any punishment after an MLB review determined that all organizations were now compliant with the new rules, which took effect yesterday. 
In-game iPad use was subjected to increased restrictions after a sign-stealing scandal surfaced in 2021. 
In the intervening years, teams began pushing for more lenience, which the commission is now walking back. 
"Gotta stop the cheating before there's cheating now," an unnamed front office official told *The Athletic*. 
Baseball is heaven for stat nerds, and crunching a lot of data quickly is one of the best uses for AI. 
Sure, there may be a statistically proven best decision at any given time, but once you throw physical, mental and emotional performance into the mix, the mathematically correct answer may not in fact be the best one. 
Tech is great as a backup, like with the new ABS system, but using it as a replacement for brains and intuition sounds like a quick way to suck all the joy out of the sport. 
A game of baseball is not identical to a game of chess, and we shouldn't encourage it to be. 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
4.9%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
4.4%
Overconfidence Bias
10.8%
Framing Effect
12.5%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
17.4%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
6.1%
Pessimism Bias
16%
Negativity Bias
35.5%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
6.1%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
18%
Primacy Effect
4.9%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
5.2%
False Dilemma
10.2%
Slippery Slope
22.4%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
4.9%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
16.6%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
14%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
5.5%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
13.1%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
43%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
4.7%
Quote-first Misdirection
4.7%
Biased Writer Voice
22.4%
Indoctrination
20.1%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

344 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.