Harriette Cole: My brother’s wife wanted to be at a hotel, so she treated my house like one 32%

By Harriette Cole49%

8/7/2026, 2:00:01 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, False Dilemma, and Biased Writer Voice, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 19% saturation with 114 hits. Analysis detected 858 faulty-reasoning hits from 600 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 33.7% and a BS Rank of 32% (20,969 of 30,584 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 68.60% of the article peer group.

DEAR HARRIETTE: My brother and his wife came up to stay with me to celebrate her birthday. 
My family and I mapped out a fun itinerary covering everything they mentioned wanting to see. 
It’s safe to say some money was spent in the making of this production. 
Unfortunately, though, at home, we found ourselves in disagreement on a few things. 
Although I bought all the groceries, breakfast items and snacks they requested, my sister-in-law expected to be served while on vacation. 
Separately, she refused to ever turn off the air conditioning unit in the guest room, even when we’d leave home. 
I knew that would have a huge impact on my electric bill. 
I spoke to my brother about it, but his excuse was, “It’s her birthday.” 
I tried mentioning it to her. 
She scoffed and said that she actually wanted to be at a hotel and shouldn’t have to compromise on a nice experience just because her husband had other plans. 
This soured the rest of their stay for me. 
I think it may be best for them to stay in a hotel whenever they visit in the future. 
Am I overreacting? 
 Hotel Amenities 
DEAR HOTEL AMENITIES: You have every right to want to grant your sister-in-law her wishes for her next visit  let them stay at a hotel. 
You are not a maid nor her bankroll. 
The fact that she was so selfish to expect you to serve her with no regard for you speaks volumes, but more, your brother allowed it. 
Tell him that you feel they took advantage of you and you do not appreciate that. 
DEAR HARRIETTE: I gave my neighbor in my apartment building my phone number so if either of us ever needed anything, we could contact each other. 
Now he texts me all the time with all these annoying requests. 
For example, he’s asked me to borrow cups of sugar or help me move things around in his apartment. 
He texts me at least two to three times a week about something for me to help him with. 
I didn’t mind at first because I thought that’s what good neighbors do for each other. 
If he needed a small favor here or there, I was happy to help. 
But over time, the requests have become more frequent, and I’m starting to feel like he’s taking advantage of my kindness. 
I don’t think he’s trying to be rude, but it’s gotten to the point where I hesitate every time my phone buzzes because I assume it’s another request. 
I also don’t want to create an awkward situation since we live in the same building and see each other regularly. 
How can I set boundaries with my neighbor but also not make anything weird between us since we do live so close? 
 Needy Neighbor 
DEAR NEEDY NEIGHBOR: Start saying no when he makes requests. 
Tell him you are unavailable to help when you don’t have the time or desire. 
Over time, wean him off the texts. 
At some point, say to him that when it’s an emergency, he and you should use a special code word. 
Otherwise, you will help if you can, but you cannot be as available to him as he seems to want. 
Harriette Cole is a lifestylist and founder of DREAMLEAPERS, an initiative to help people access and activate their dreams. 
You can send questions to askharriette@harriettecole.com or c/o Andrews McMeel Syndication, 1130 Walnut St., Kansas City, MO 64106. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.7%Harriette Cole: 2.6%East Bay Times: 2.7%Confirmation Bias6.7%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.4%East Bay Times: 0.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 2.3%Harriette Cole: 1.8%East Bay Times: 2.1%Availability Heuristic2.3%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.6%East Bay Times: 0.4%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.1%East Bay Times: 0.2%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 2.0%Harriette Cole: 0.6%East Bay Times: 0.3%Overconfidence Bias2.0%This article: 6.0%Harriette Cole: 1.0%East Bay Times: 2.7%Framing Effect6.0%This article: 3.5%Harriette Cole: 0.5%East Bay Times: 0.5%Loss Aversion3.5%This article: 3.3%Harriette Cole: 0.4%East Bay Times: 0.3%Status Quo Bias3.3%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.5%East Bay Times: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 2.7%Harriette Cole: 1.5%East Bay Times: 0.9%Optimism Bias2.7%This article: 1.5%Harriette Cole: 1.8%East Bay Times: 1.0%Pessimism Bias1.5%This article: 18.0%Harriette Cole: 6.1%East Bay Times: 5.4%Negativity Bias18.0%This article: 2.7%Harriette Cole: 1.8%East Bay Times: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias2.7%This article: 9.5%Harriette Cole: 3.8%East Bay Times: 1.8%Fundamental Attribution Error9.5%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.4%East Bay Times: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.1%East Bay Times: 0.3%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.1%East Bay Times: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.4%East Bay Times: 1.3%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.2%East Bay Times: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.2%Harriette Cole: 0.6%East Bay Times: 0.6%Recency Bias3.2%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.3%East Bay Times: 0.0%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.3%East Bay Times: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 4.3%Harriette Cole: 0.5%East Bay Times: 0.3%Ad Hominem4.3%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.1%East Bay Times: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.6%East Bay Times: 0.8%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 16.2%Harriette Cole: 3.0%East Bay Times: 0.9%False Dilemma16.2%This article: 1.2%Harriette Cole: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.4%Slippery Slope1.2%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.7%Harriette Cole: 2.4%East Bay Times: 2.1%Hasty Generalization6.7%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.1%East Bay Times: 0.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 1.3%Harriette Cole: 0.8%East Bay Times: 2.8%Appeal to Emotion1.3%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.3%East Bay Times: 0.3%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.8%East Bay Times: 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 2.7%Harriette Cole: 0.5%East Bay Times: 0.6%Burden of Proof2.7%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.1%East Bay Times: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 3.2%Harriette Cole: 0.9%East Bay Times: 1.1%Anecdotal3.2%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.6%East Bay Times: 0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.5%Harriette Cole: 0.2%East Bay Times: 0.1%Middle Ground0.5%This article: 1.5%Harriette Cole: 0.2%East Bay Times: 0.1%Personal Incredulity1.5%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.1%East Bay Times: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 7.2%Harriette Cole: 1.2%East Bay Times: 0.7%Unattributed Quote7.2%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.2%East Bay Times: 0.3%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 11.8%Harriette Cole: 1.9%East Bay Times: 4.4%Biased Writer Voice11.8%This article: 19.0%Harriette Cole: 9.3%East Bay Times: 3.6%Indoctrination19.0%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 6.2%Harriette Cole: 1.8%East Bay Times: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…6.2%

600 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.