BS Summary: This article contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Optimism Bias, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 25.8% saturation with 123 hits. Analysis detected 1,125 faulty-reasoning hits from 476 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 57.4% and a BS Rank of 61% (6,271 of 15,976 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 60.80% of the article peer group.

As stablecoin use surges globally, traditional finance is rushing to keep pace. 
Many businesses, though, are still getting up to speed on how to integrate dollar-pegged tokens into customer payments, and London-based startup Velocity—which on Tuesday announced a $38 million Series A funding round—is one of the firms helping them to do so. 
“These are companies that do not understand that they can be using stablecoins to solve their problems. 
Those are the people we are going for,” said Rob Hadick, a general partner at the venture capital firm Dragonfly, which has carved out a niche in backing firms that facilitate fiat-to-bridge transactions. 
Dragonfly and Firstmark led Velocity’s Series A round, which also included investments from Coinbase, Capital One Ventures, and Wintermute. 
Eric Queathem, founder and CEO of Velocity, declined to specify at what valuation his startup raised its most recent stash of capital. 
Corporate stablecoin push 
Founded in 2025, Velocity aims to tap into the industry’s rapid expansion, with its name pointing to its goal of making payments faster through stablecoins. 
The company declined to name specific clients but said its customers include a mix of global merchants, payment providers, fintechs, and financial institutions. 
Queathem has encountered the frustrations that arise when using traditional banking rails to settle cross-border transactions. 
Before Velocity, he spent the last nine years at payments technology company WorldPay, leading corporate strategy and acquisitions before launching their crypto and global payouts division. 
There, he saw that while consumer payments looked sleek, the underlying infrastructure was “awful.” 
Velocity sees traditional banks and foreign exchange houses as its main competitors, rather than other payments startups. 
Hadick described Velocity as a model that moves beyond simpler use cases into the more complex treasury and cross-border settlement needs of large companies. 
“What Velocity has built is what we think is the easiest, most comprehensive set of solutions for these businesses to come on-chain and to do [so] in a way that’s familiar to them,” Queathem told Fortune . 
The company already operates in the United States, parts of Europe, and Australia, and plans to use the new capital to obtain licenses required to expand into Africa and Latin America. 
It will also invest in infrastructure for secure asset custody and develop features such as yield-generating stablecoin products. 
Stablecoins have rapidly expanded over the past two years, extending beyond fintech and into Wall Street. 
Proponents say they enable faster cross-border payments and lower transaction costs, and venture investors have committed hundreds of millions of dollars to the sector over the past year. 
In June, Open Standard, a consortium of financial firms including Stripe, Visa , BlackRock , and more than 140 others, said it would launch its own stablecoin to compete with the market’s current leaders. 
This story was originally featured on Fortune.com 
Confirmation Bias
3.4%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
10.7%
Representativeness Heuristic
15.8%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
7.8%
Framing Effect
6.9%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
18.1%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
2.9%
Self-Serving Bias
6.9%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
3.6%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
10.5%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
3.4%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
3.6%
Appeal to Authority
25.8%
False Dilemma
3.8%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
8.6%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
15.5%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
3.4%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
5.3%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
7.8%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
7.8%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
14.9%
Quote-first Misdirection
3.6%
Biased Writer Voice
23.3%
Indoctrination
5.3%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
17.9%

476 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.