The Intercept80%
The End of the Voting Rights Act Isn’t Just a “Black Problem” 87%
By Alain Stephens0%
5/20/2026, 10:09:00 AM
BS Summary: This article contains 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 55.1% saturation with 729 hits. Analysis detected 4,468 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,324 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 80.2% and a BS Rank of 87% (2,282 of 16,813 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 86.40% of the article peer group.
Within days of the Supreme Court’s ruling in Louisiana v.
Callais, Republican lawmakers across the South moved with remarkable speed to carve up Black constituencies and consolidate political power.
Tennessee rushed to dismantle Memphis’s majority-Black district.
Louisiana went further, postponing an ongoing election and moving to eliminate a majority-Black district that snakes for more than 200 miles, from Baton Rouge to Shreveport.
South Carolina and Georgia began maneuvering toward special sessions to redraw districts to be even more favorable to Republicans.
Democrats have warned that up to one-third of the Congressional Black Caucus could disappear, and Republicans aim to pick up as many as 15 House seats.
The immediate reaction shattered the comforting fiction that America has somehow transcended race in its democratic life.
The court may describe these protections as outdated relics of another era, but the swift political response revealed something older and more durable beneath the surface: preserving racial hierarchy remains one of the most potent organizing instincts in American politics.
The Supreme Court’s continued dismantling of the Voting Rights Act is often framed as a tragedy that primarily affects Black Americans.
It is that.
But in a much larger sense, it also reveals how willing the country is to weaken its own democracy to keep these racialized systems of power intact.
It is no surprise that many of the former slaveholding states have once again moved to cheat the nation out of its democratic values.
While most Confederate soldiers did not personally own slaves, the poison of white supremacy still convinced countless poor and working-class white men to fracture the country, slaughter their fellow Americans, and march themselves into mass death on the battlefield to preserve a racial order that benefited an elite planter class more than it ever benefited them.
After the Civil War, the South could have become a multiracial democracy built around poor Black and white laborers with overlapping economic interests.
During Reconstruction, formerly enslaved Black Americans briefly helped build some of the South’s first systems of universal public education and expanded democratic participation across the region.
But Southern elites responded by enacting Jim Crow laws — not merely to dominate Black Americans, but also to preempt any nascent democratic solidarity.
As historian Heather Cox Richardson has written, wealthy Southern landowners understood that interracial democracy threatened the entire economic order that had sustained plantation rule.
The system harmed Black Americans most brutally.
White racists got what they wanted: segregation, lynchings, and Black exclusion from political life.
But it also left millions of poor and working-class white Americans trapped inside oligarchic state structures, one-party political machines insulated from accountability and designed to serve landowners, industrialists, and political dynasties.
As Suresh Naidu, a professor of economics and international affairs at Columbia University, found in his study of postbellum Southern disenfranchisement that poll taxes and literacy tests didn’t just suppress Black voters — they also hurt democratic participation across the South as a whole, reducing overall voter turnout by 8 to 22 percent.
As a result, public goods, such as schools and sanitation, weakened, labor organizing collapsed under racial division, and political options narrowed for Southern whites.
These shadows still haunt the South, the region that accounts for the nation’s highest poverty rates and lowest per capita GDP compared to other regions.
Lyndon B.
Johnson, who signed the Voting Rights Act into law, infamously observed that “If you can convince the lowest white man he’s better than the best colored man, he won’t notice you’re picking his pocket.”
Johnson was articulating a fundamental truth about American political history: Racial status has often been used as compensation for democratic and economic weakness.
It’s a system that has never disappeared.
The erosion of democracy in our current era also cuts both ways.
As the Voting Rights Act is chipped away, blue states are increasingly incentivized to answer Republican gerrymandering with politically motivated maps of their own.
The country drifts further from representative democracy and deeper into a retaliatory system where both parties manipulate their electorates for survival.
Ordinary Americans become pawns in a larger struggle over racial hierarchy and entrenched political power.
Millions of voters — many of them white Americans — are treated as acceptable political sacrifices in the effort to preserve white conservative hegemony across the South.
Their votes become collateral damage in a campaign of anti-Blackness.
It is an odd gamble to watch: these southern Republican yes-men rushing to exploit the hollowed-out voter protections at a period of time when their states have so much to lose.
As other Republicans have voiced concerns about Trump’s unilateral war on Iran, it is actually the bodies of the South that stand to risk the most, as Southern states have long supplied a disproportionate amount of the nation’s combat troops.
Trump’s tariff wars have also hammered away at that historic pillar of Southern agriculture, particularly the soybean, cotton, poultry, and manufacturing sectors that rely heavily on exports to foreign markets.
Farmers across states like Arkansas, Texas, Georgia, and the Carolinas have been forced to depend on bailouts after retaliatory tariffs slashed export demand and destabilized prices.
In trying to keep Black Americans farther from opportunity and power, white Southerners ultimately moved those civic possibilities farther from themselves, too.
What we stand to be left with is an electoral system based on voting blocs engineered by the elites, for the elites.
Researchers found that when politics harden into insulated gerrymandered coalitions, democratic systems become less responsive, less representative, and more vulnerable to authoritarian behavior.
Politically jaded Americans, who increasingly identify as independents or report feeling disenfranchised by both parties, have now catapulted themselves into an arena with even fewer choices and no real levers left to pull to exercise political power.
In response, the Democrats have largely offered a restrained, institutional response, with House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries urging Americans to “summon the courage, character and conviction” of civil rights figures like Rosa Parks and John Lewis, which feels backwards as hell as the Supreme Court incinerates their legacies.
Meanwhile, the Trump administration is populated with politicians and legal thinkers who have long resented the hard-fought civil rights victories in the 1960s.
Stephen Miller, one of Trump’s closest political advisers, has railed against the 1965 Immigration and Nationality Act, the law which banned European preferences in immigration.
Russell Vought, an architect of Project 2025 and Trump’s current director of the Office of Management and Budget, has argued that the post-1960s civil rights bureaucracy should be remolded away from protecting diversity and toward defending the interests of white Americans.
The right-wing campaign to roll back civil rights protections has always rested on a myth, on a dismissal of the role Black Americans have served throughout American history.
It assumes the long battle for equal protections, fair labor, and true democracy was only for the benefit of Black people.
It’s a falsehood that serves only to deepen racial divisions to discourage any form of class-based solidarity.
Instead, we have been here through time to hold America to its promised principles of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness — a stress testing of its legitimacy for all.
But for a court so convinced America has made “great strides” in ending racism, it is worth asking why its allure is still so powerful, and why so many white Americans are willing to trade away parts of their own freedom in its service.
Perhaps it lies in the pervasiveness of understanding racism as only a “Black problem” — an unfortunate deviation from an otherwise “normal” white arrangement.
As sociologist Robert Terry once put it, “To be white in America is not to have to think about it.”
But that lack of self awareness carries a cost: generations of white Americans re-ushering in white hegemony so reflexively they often fail to see how it has shrunk their own democracy, political imagination, and livelihoods in the process.
Analysis
Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.