All the President’s Mandates: Compulsory Health Insurance Is a Government Takeover (Briefing Paper) 96%

By null null93%

9/23/2009, 4:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 30.9% saturation with 90 hits. Analysis detected 1,121 faulty-reasoning hits from 291 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 93.4% and a BS Rank of 96% (784 of 17,195 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 95.40% of the article peer group.

The most hazardous health reform measure before Congress is not the so-called “public option,” but proposals to make health insurance compulsory via an individual or employer mandate. 
Compulsory health insurance could require nearly 100 million Americans to switch to a more expensive health plan and would therefore violate President Barack Obama’s pledge to let people keep their current health insurance. 
In particular, the legislation before Congress could eliminate many or all health savings account plans. 
Making health insurance compulsory would also spark an unnecessary fight over abortion and would enable government to ration care to those with private health insurance. 
Obama adviser Larry Summers writes that mandates “are like public programs financed by benefit taxes,” meaning that compulsory health insurance would also violate President Obama’s promise not to increase taxes on the middle class. 
Under the House Democrats’ legislation, some middle-income earners would face marginal tax rates over 50 percent (before state taxes). 
The experience in Massachusetts belies the claim that compulsory health insurance brings down health care costs. 
The “shared responsibility” ruse allows Massachusetts politicians to declare success for a compulsory health insurance scheme whose actual costs reveal it to be a failure. 
Massachusetts also demonstrates that compulsory health insurance enables, and ultimately requires, politicians and government bureaus to control nearly all aspects of health care and medical practice. 
Rather than make health insurance compulsory, Congress should make it more affordable by letting individuals control their earnings and choose their own health plan from any state in the Union. 
Michael F. 
Cannon is director of health policy studies at the Cato Institute and coauthor of Healthy Competition: What’s Holding Back Health Care and How to Free It. 
Confirmation Bias
20.3%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
6.5%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
4.5%
Loss Aversion
11.3%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
8.9%
Optimism Bias
10.3%
Pessimism Bias
10.7%
Negativity Bias
30.9%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
8.9%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
8.6%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
20.6%
False Dilemma
19.6%
Slippery Slope
17.5%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
26.5%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
13.1%
Begging the Question
19.9%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
11.3%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
14.4%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
20.3%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
10.3%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
11.7%
Quote-first Misdirection
8.6%
Biased Writer Voice
22%
Indoctrination
21.6%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
26.8%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

291 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.