BS Summary: These Cato Institute results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 1,055 hits. Analysis detected 7,386 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,580 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠27% (16,771 of 22,929 keywords). This Cato Institute is better (less manipulative) than 73.10% of the peer group.
Cato Institute
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Wholegrains0%
⁠0%Weed0%
⁠0%Wang Wen0%
⁠0%Vegetation Fire0%
⁠0%U S House0%
⁠27%Cato Institute (selected)3%
⁠100%Reuven Carlyle60%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 8,580
Article count: 2
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Cato Institute attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Cato Institute vs All Other Publications
Cato Institute attribute percentages, with an overlaid baseline for all publications (Overall) for those same attributes.