Topic summary
⁠79%1 analyzed article/video691 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Youtube Policies results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 317 hits. Analysis detected 3,057 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,764 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (5,887 of 24,545 topics). This Youtube Policies is worse (more manipulative) than 76.00% of the peer group.
Youtube Policies
Topic details
Total words: 2,764
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

76% percentile
025507510076.0% percentile
4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.4%0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.6%9.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.7%8.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 11.5%11.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.9%3.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.7%5.7%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 5.5%5.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 10.1%10.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 3.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 2.5%Anecdotal: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos