Topic summary
ā 12%1 analyzed article/video1,022 analyzed words
BS Summary: These X Men results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Negativity Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 26.9% saturation with 826 hits. Analysis detected 2,085 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,066 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ā 42% (7,265 of 12,364 topics). This X Men is better (less manipulative) than 58.80% of the peer group.
X Men
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Self-Driving Cars1%
ā 0%Self Driving Cars1%
ā 0%Survival Stories1%
ā 0%Gender Identity1%
ā 42%X Men (selected)3%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 3,066
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
X Men attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
X Men vs sitewide
X Men attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos