Topic summary
27%3 analyzed articles/videos3,181 analyzed words
BS Summary: These World War I results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 1,260 hits. Analysis detected 13,167 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,024 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 13% (11,233 of 12,828 topics). This World War I is better (less manipulative) than 87.60% of the peer group.
World War I
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
World War I attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
World War I vs sitewide
World War I attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.