Topic summary
⁠39%1 analyzed article/video530 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wisconsin Gubernatorial Election results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 156 hits. Analysis detected 1,225 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,120 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (14,472 of 21,641 topics). This Wisconsin Gubernatorial Election is better (less manipulative) than 66.90% of the peer group.
Wisconsin Gubernatorial Election
Topic details
Total words: 2,120
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

33% percentile
025507510033.1% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.4%7.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 6.5%6.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 0.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos