Topic summary
⁠35%2 analyzed articles/videos2,513 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wildlife Reintroduction results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Pessimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 829 hits. Analysis detected 4,655 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,539 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠11% (13,776 of 15,397 topics). This Wildlife Reintroduction is better (less manipulative) than 89.50% of the peer group.
Wildlife Reintroduction
Topic details
Total words: 7,539
Article count: 2
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Wildlife Reintroduction attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Wildlife Reintroduction vs sitewide
Wildlife Reintroduction attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos