Topic summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos4,466 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wildlife Protection results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.4% saturation with 1,328 hits. Analysis detected 13,732 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,872 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 9% (11,896 of 13,018 topics). This Wildlife Protection is better (less manipulative) than 91.40% of the peer group.
Wildlife Protection
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Wildlife Protection attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Wildlife Protection vs sitewide
Wildlife Protection attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.