Topic summary
⁠88%1 analyzed article/video347 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wildlife Feeding results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 149 hits. Analysis detected 1,388 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,388 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (5,428 of 24,545 topics). This Wildlife Feeding is worse (more manipulative) than 77.90% of the peer group.
Wildlife Feeding
Topic details
Total words: 1,388
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

78% percentile
025507510077.9% percentile
4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.5%6.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 7.3%7.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 7.1%7.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.7%10.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.8%2.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 5.3%5.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 4.9%4.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 8.0%8.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.7%Anecdotal: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.4%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Straw Man: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos