Topic summary
76%1 analyzed article/video890 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wildfire Impact results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 22.9% saturation with 814 hits. Analysis detected 4,137 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,560 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 72% (5,482 of 19,081 topics). This Wildfire Impact is worse (more manipulative) than 71.30% of the peer group.
Wildfire Impact
Topic details
Total words: 3,560
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Wildfire Impact attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Wildfire Impact vs sitewide
Wildfire Impact attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos